Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 12456 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
Search Again
 Back
 Table of Contents
 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed386    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
ARTICLE
Year : 1996  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 240-247

Strengths and Limitations in Using Psychiatric Measures Across Cultures


1 Professor of Psychiatry, Madras Medical College & Government General Hospital, Madras - 600 003, India
2 Social Scientist, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Madras Medical College & Government General Hospital, Madras - 600 003, India

Correspondence Address:
S Rajkumar
Professor of Psychiatry, Madras Medical College & Government General Hospital, Madras - 600 003
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21584138

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Issues concerning the application of psychiatric measures across cultures are discussed in the light of the authors experiences with the Geriatric Mental State (GMS) and the WHO Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). The aceptability of the GMS to non - literate populations are examined in the context of culture, age ascertainment, education and cognition and variances between the GMS - psychiatrist diagnosis. The WHOQOL which is in the developmental stage, brings forth issues concerning qualitative techniques in instrument development; conceptual, semantic and technical equivalence; translations and backtranslations and response formats. Potential barriers to using an existing measure in a new setting or developing a cross-culturally comparable one are elaborated.



[PDF]*

        

Print this article         Email this article