Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 3004 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
Search Again
 Back
 Table of Contents
 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed447    
    Printed29    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded91    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 1998  |  Volume : 40  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 135-148

The Relevance to Meta-Analysis, Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration to Clinical Psychiatry


Professor of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 6320O2, India

Correspondence Address:
Prathap Tharyan
Professor of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 6320O2
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21494461

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Traditional review articles provide clinicians with syntheses of the medical literature but are criticised as being haphazard in their methodology and biased in their conclusions. Systematic reviews use rigorous methods to minimise bias and statistical methods to synthesise results (meta-analysis) that increase power and precision. They permit investigation of generalisability and consistency, improve transparency of methodology, and enhance reproducibility. This article examines the science of systematic reviews and meta-analysis and their relevance to clinical psychiatry. It evaluates the potential errors and sources of bias of meta-analysis, and offers guidelines for evaluation of systematic reviews. It highlights the efforts of the Cochrane Collaboration which is an international organisation involved in preparing, maintaining and disseminating highly structured, frequently updated, and good quality systematic reviews of the effects of interventions in all aspects of health care.



[PDF]*

        

Print this article         Email this article