Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 542 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results and Disc...
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1536    
    Printed93    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded268    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Table of Contents   
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 157-159
Assessment of the domains of quality of life in the geriatric population


Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication24-Sep-2009
 

   Abstract 

Background: The number of studies from India on geriatric health problems, particularly mental health disorders and quality of life, is limited.
Aim: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the geriatric population visiting the Dr T.M.A. Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala, Karnataka. It examined the different domains of quality of life according to sociodemographic variables.
Methods: We studied 70 individuals in the geriatric age group (?60 years) who visited the hospital over a period of two months from March 2003 to April 2003. The results were expressed in terms of mean and SE of mean. Z-test and one-way ANOVA test were applied to compare the mean scores of different variables under the four domains. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The total mean score, as well as the mean scores in each of the four domains studied were similar in men and women as well as literates and illiterates. The mean scores of subjects in various age groups differed significantly in the domains of physical, psychological and social relations, while single and married subjects differed significantly in the domains of environmental and social relations. Overall well-being was significantly affected in those who were single (unmarried/widowed) or in the age group of 60-69 years.

Keywords: Quality of life, geriatric population, domains, well-being

How to cite this article:
Barua A, Mangesh R, Harsha Kumar H N, Mathew S. Assessment of the domains of quality of life in the geriatric population. Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:157-9

How to cite this URL:
Barua A, Mangesh R, Harsha Kumar H N, Mathew S. Assessment of the domains of quality of life in the geriatric population. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2005 [cited 2020 Feb 25];47:157-9. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2005/47/3/157/55940



   Introduction Top


The effects of disease and health interventions on an individual's quality of life can be measured by quality of life assessments. All the aspects of 'health status', 'lifestyle', 'life satisfaction', 'mental state' and 'well-being' together reflect the multidimensional nature of quality of life. [1],[2] However, in India, only a few studies have explored geriatric health problems, particularly mental health disorders and quality of life. [3],[4],[5] Considering this background, this mental health study was conducted to examine the different domains of quality of life affected by sociodemographic factors in the geriatric population visiting the Dr T.M.A. Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala, Karnataka.


   Methods Top


This cross-sectional study was carried out in 70 individuals of the geriatric age group (³60 years of age) visiting the Dr T.M.A. Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala, Karnataka over two months from March 2003 to April 2003.

Study instrument

A face sheet containing information on the household of the respondent was used for data collection. We used the World Health Organization-Quality of life (WHOQOL)-BREF [6],[7] instrument to assess the quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF instrument was translated into Kannada by researchers and back-translated into English by another expert not acquainted with the original versions. The back-translated version was subsequently compared with the original by a psychiatrist for conceptual equivalence of the items. The translated version of this instrument was pre-tested on a subsample before it was used on the study population to ensure feasibility and acceptability.

Data collection

No sampling procedure was applied to select our study subjects. Individuals ³60 years of age, who consented to give the interview, were included in the study. The interviews were conducted in the hospital. Each interview took approximately 30 minutes. After initial introduction and rapport building, the sociodemographic data were collected, following which the respondents were administered the WHOQOL-BREF.

Data analysis

Data were tabulated and analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 7.5. The results were expressed in terms of mean and SE of mean. Z-test and one­way ANOVA test were applied to compare the mean scores of different variables under the four domains. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

The majority of the study population belonged to the age group of 60-69 years (80%). Sixty per cent of the study population were females and 75.7% literate. While 78.6% of the individuals were married, 21.4% were either unmarried or widowed. The mean age of the study population was 65.8 years (SD±4.9).


   Results and Discussion Top


[Table 1] compares the mean scores in physical, psychological, social relations and environmental domain according to sex, age group, marital status and literacy status.

  1. The total mean score as well as the mean scores in each of the four domains for both men and women were found to be similar. The difference between the two groups was not found to be statistically significant for any of the four domains.
  2. The mean scores of the two age groups of 60-69 years and ?70 years were found to differ significantly in the domains of physical (p=0.004), psychological (p=0.001) and social relations (p=0.016). This difference between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant for the total mean score in all the domains (p=0.006).

    Hence, the overall well-being was significantly affected for those who were in the age group of 60-69 years.
  3. The mean scores of those single and married differed significantly in the domains of environmental (p=0.012) and social relations (p=0.002). This difference between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant for the total mean score of all the domains (p=0.016). Thus, the overall well-being was significantly affected for those who were single (unmarried and widowed).
  4. The total mean score, as well as the mean scores in each of the four domains for both literate and illiterate subjects were found to be similar. A little difference between the two groups was, however, not found to be statistically significant for any of these four domains.
ANOVA test results

One-way ANOVA test was applied to compare the mean scores of all the domains and the total score for each of the four independent variables, i.e. sex, age group, marital status and literacy status.

Sex

No significant difference in the mean scores was observed in the physical (p=0.435), psychological (p=0.857), social (p=0.840) and environmental (p=0.336) domains, and also on total scores (p=0.939) among men and women.

Age group

There was a significant difference in the mean scores in the physical (p=0.004), psychological (p=0.001) and social (p=0.016) domains, and also on total scores (p=0.006) among those in the age groups of ³60-69 years and ³70 years.

Marital status

There was a significant difference in the mean scores in the social (p=0.002) and environmental (p=0.012) domains, and also on total scores (p=0.016) among single and married subjects.

Literacy status

There was no significant difference in the mean scores in the physical (p=0.648), psychological (p=0.778), social (p=0.662) and environmental (p=0.993) domains, and also on total scores (p=0.944) among illiterate and literate subjects.


   Conclusion Top


The total mean score, as well as the mean scores in each of the four domains were similar in men and women as well as among literate and illiterate subjects. The mean scores of those in the 60-69 and ³70 years' age groups differed significantly in the domains of physical, psychological and social relations, while single and married subjects differed significantly in the domains of environmental and social relations. The overall well-being was significantly affected for those who were single (unmarried/widowed) or in the age group of 60-69 years.

 
   References Top

1.World Health Organization (WHO). Well-being measures in primary health care. The DEPCARE project. Report on a WHO meeting. Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.The WHOQOL Group. The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W (eds). Quality of life assessment: International perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer­Verlag; 1994:43.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Dey AB (ed). Handbook on health care of the elderly: A manual for physicians in primary and secondary health care facilities. New Delhi: WHO, Regional Office for South-East Asia; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.WHO. Men, ageing and health. Geneva: WHO; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.WHO. World health report. Mental health: New understanding, new hope. Geneva: WHO; 2001:43.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.WHO. World Health Organization-Quality of life: WHOQOL­BREF: Australian version (May 2000). Geneva: WHO; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Nelson CB, Lotfy M. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. Geneva: WHO (MNH/MHP/99.7); 1999.  Back to cited text no. 7      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Ankur Barua
Department of Community Medicine, Sikkim-Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences (SMIMS), 5th Mile Tadong, Gangtok 737102, Sikkim
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.55940

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top