Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 2750 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3432    
    Printed58    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded162    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 49  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 296-297
Rejoinder in reply to critical appraisal on "factitious schizophrenia"


Department of Psychiatry, GMC and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

How to cite this article:
Raj R, Sidhu BS. Rejoinder in reply to critical appraisal on "factitious schizophrenia". Indian J Psychiatry 2007;49:296-7

How to cite this URL:
Raj R, Sidhu BS. Rejoinder in reply to critical appraisal on "factitious schizophrenia". Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Jan 24];49:296-7. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2007/49/4/296/37675


Sir,

We are grateful to the authors of "factitious schizophrenia" [1],[2] for having opened the Pandora's box again. A case report is to be presented on the basis of facts, logic and reason. No statement is valid universally for all times. The case report and reply are gauged with many inconsistent premises, ambiguous and doubtful evidences, and they lack diagnostic validity of factitious disorder. The authors' argument in defense of their diagnosis is based on personal conjectures with bias entering in their results.

There are certain fallacies inherent in their deductive and inductive reasoning. The patient's initial contact with the psychiatrist for depression, transient blindness (para 4, page 170) [1] and schizophrenia (para 6, page 169) [1] was at the age of 16 years. The diagnosis of schizophrenia was confirmed by the psychiatrist in the Department of Psychiatry, Pgimer0 (post graduate institute of medical education and research, Chandigarh), and treated for more than a year with antipsychotic drugs, i.e., Risperdone and Ziprasidone; whence, the patient developed left-sided gynecomastia. There is self-contradictory explanation regarding antipsychotic medication, its initiation and continuation for two years (para 3, page 203; para 2, page 204). [2] Patient had developed seizure at the age of 17 years (para 4, page 170), [1] which later turned out to be pseudoseizure, [3] not so uncommon presentation; up to 10% of cases with seizures disorder have feigned symptoms (para 9, page 170). [1] At the age of 18 years, patient reported to psychiatric emergency for attempted suicide, atypical features of depression, hopelessness and continuous auditory hallucinations (para 5, page 169). [1] Hence, total duration of illness and treatment was two years (para 3, page 203). [2]

He was diagnosed as emotionally unstable personality, impulsive type on international personality disorder examination, IPDE (para 6, page 170). [1] On psychological analysis, it was stated that initially he was unaware of the symptoms, i.e., unintentional. A motivation to assume sick role was to save his passive mother from a dominating and anankastic (obsessive) father, who forced sexual acts against her wish (para 3, page 170) [1] - a primary gain; and continuation of symptoms was for care, love and affection - a secondary gain.

The patient's acceptance that he was feigning symptoms for the last two years and authors' contention that it was factitious disorder, [4] predominantly psychogenic type, might have taken place during therapeutic relationship. The issue of boundary violation by borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients is not uncommon. This is essentially true when the clinical picture is dominated by psychopathic traits (as described by Hare) of the intensely narcissistic type - grandiosity, conning, lack of remorse, lying and manipulative behavior. [5] The therapist might have been idealized by the patient during the session.

The authors' futile attempt to delineate a part of illness (factitious disorder) as disease and neglecting the whole [6] (borderline personality disorder) panorama of symptoms, i.e., atypical features of depression, self-harm, suicidal gestures, impulsivity, simulation psychosis, during stressful condition, pseudoseizure and dissociation was erroneous. The following points need reappraisal: there is considerable comorbidity between BPD and various dissociative symptoms, including depersonalization, derealization and loss of reality, which are not uncommon and may contribute to the psychotic-like symptoms that a patient with BPD may experience. [7],[8],[9],[10]

Depression, often with atypical features, is particularly common in patients with BPD. Although the distinction can be difficult to make, depressive features that appear in BPD with a particular characteristic are emptiness, self-condemnation, abandonment fear, hopelessness, self-destructiveness and repeated suicidal gestures. [11],[12],[13]

Primary features of BPD are impulsive self-destructive behavior, substance abuse, risky behavior, self-mutilation and suicidal attempts. The behavior is thought to reflect the difficulties patients with BPD have with modulation and containment of intense emotions or impulses. They exhibit suspiciousness, referential thinking, paranoid ideation, illusion, derealization, depersonalization or hallucination-like symptoms. [14]

In the light of above evidences, the truth of borderline personality may get revealed with a pure rationalistic and scientific inquiry and it removes the veil of darkness from the confounding factor like factitious schizophrenia, which is one-ninth part of the diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder [14] ; the truth is thus enlightening.

 
   References Top

1.Grover S, Kumar S, Mattoo SK. Factitious schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Kumar S, Grover S, Mattoo SK. Reply to critical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2006;48:203-4.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.King DW, Gallangher BB, Murvin AJ, Smith DB, Marcus DJ, Hartlage LC, et al. Pseudoseizures: Diagnostic evaluation. Neurology 1982;32:18-23.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Feldman MD, Ford CV. Factitious disorder. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors. Comprehensive textbook of Psychiatry. 7 th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia; 2000. p. 1533-43.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Hare RD. The Hare psychopathy checklist- Revised. Mental Health System: North Tonawanda, NY; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Raj R, Sidhu BS. Critical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2006;48:132.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Paris J, Zweig- Frank H. Dissociation in patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:137-8.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Saxe GN, Vander Kolk BA, Berkowitz R, Chinman G, Hall K, Lieberg G, et al. Dissociative disorders in psychiatric in-patients. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:1037-42.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Galletly C. Borderline-dissociation co-morbidity. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154;1629.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Brodsky BS, Cloitre M, Dulit RA. Relationship of dissociation to self-mutilation and childhood abuse in borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1788-92.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Soloff PH, Geogre A, Nuthen RS, Schulz PM. Characterizing depression in borderline patients. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48:155-7.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Rogers JH, Widiger TA, Krupp A. Aspects of depression associated with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:268-70.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  
13.Gunderson JG, Phillips KA. A current view of the interface between borderline personality disorder and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:967-75.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  
14.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4 th ed. (DSM-IV). APA: Washington, DC; 1994.  Back to cited text no. 14    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Rajnish Raj
34, Phulkian Enclave, Near Mini Secretariat, Patiala -147 001, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.37675

Rights and Permissions




 

Top