| Abstract|| |
Background: Despite adequate treatment, patients with bipolar disorder suffer from subsyndromal symptoms. This study has been done to see the association of subsyndromal symptoms with age of onset, duration of illness, duration of episodes, and number of episodes.
Aims: To know the prevalence of subsyndromal symptoms and their relationship with age of onset, total duration of illness, number of episodes, and duration of episodes in patients with bipolar disorder in remission.
Materials and Methods: The study was cross sectional and hospital based. One hundred patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, diagnosed as bipolar disorder according to Research Diagnostic Criteria of ICD-10, and with good compliance with the prophylactic medications, score of ≤5 on Beck's Mania Rating Scale (BMRS) and score ≤8 on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were recruited by the purposive sampling method. Descriptive statistics were used to describe various sample characteristics. Group differences for categorical variables were examined with the chi-square test, whereas an independent 't' test was used for continuous variables.
Results: The most common manic symptom was a decrease in sleep (49%), followed by an increase in verbal activity (39%), hostility (37%), and increase in motor activity (33.33%). The subsyndromal manic group had a lower age of onset (58.8%), males (82.4%), unemployed (23.5%), educated (80.4%). There was no significant difference between with and without subsyndromal mania groups with respect to age, age of onset, duration of illness, number of episode, and average duration of episode.
Conclusion: Subsyndromal manic symptoms are prevalent and have no relationship with current age, age of onset of illness, duration of illness, number of episode, and average duration of illness in patient with bipolar disorder in remission.
Keywords: Bipolar disorder, subsyndromal symptoms
|How to cite this article:|
Ram D, Ram D. Subsyndromal states in bipolar disorder. Indian J Psychiatry 2010;52:367-70
| Introduction|| |
The specification of diagnostic algorithms and cut off scores has led to the new controversy as to whether the sub-threshold/subsyndromal symptoms are a clinical problem at all, or separate phenomenon in their own right, or a minor form of major disorder, or methodological artifact created by possibly invalid definition of algorithms and threshold in the present classification systems. Such symptoms are often seen in patients with bipolar disorder and is contrary to the traditional view of remission as cardinal feature.  Studies revealed prevalence of subsyndromal symptoms in bipolar disorder ranging from 13 to 70%. ,,, However, some studies have failed to detect such symptoms.  There are few studies done on subsyndromal mania in bipolar disorder in India and tended to focus more on subsyndromal depression. The current study was under taken to find out sociodemographic correlates of subsyndromal manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study was cross sectional and hospital based conducted at Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi. It has got a wide catchments area that includes Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and neighboring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh.
A total of 100 remitted bipolar patient living in the community after the treatment of the acute phase of illness and currently only on prophylactic mood stabilizer, with regular follow up, were recruited for this study by the purposive sampling method provided they fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were both male and female patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of bipolar diagnosis according to RDC of ICD 10 criteria,  and on prophylactic mood stabilizer with a good compliance. Exclusion criteria were significant medical illness or co-morbidity, presence of any other psychiatric disorders, last episode mixed, score 5 or more on BMRS,  and score 8 or more on HDRS.  Information was collected from the patient him/herself, key person/relative accompanying the patient, case record, and treating psychiatrist.
Tool for assessment used in this study are as follows.
1. Socio-demographic and clinical proforma: This consist of patient details including age, sex, occupation, education, age of onset of illness, present history of illness, past history of psychiatric and medical illness, personal history, duration of episode, dose of mood stabilizer, compliance, physical, and mental status examinations and diagnosis.
2. Beck's mania rating scale.  It consists of 11 items. A total score 0 to 4 indicates no syndrome. A score of 5 or more indicates a manic syndrome. In order to make the diagnosis of subsyndromal mania this scale was modified as follows: score of 0 = no sub syndrome, score 1-4 = sub syndrome is present.
3. Hamilton depression rating scale.  The enlarged Hamilton depression rating scale consists of the 17 original Hamilton items and 5 Bech-Refaelsen items given in the depression scale. A total score of 0-7 indicates that there is no depression. A score of 8 or more shows that depression is present. In order to make the diagnosis of subsyndromal depression, this scale was modified as follows: score of 0 = no syndrome and score of 1-7= sub syndrome present.
4. Udvalg for kliniske undersogelser scale for side effect.  This is an observer scale for assessment of side effects of drugs. The interview was supplemented by clinical observation and information obtained from relatives and/or case records. If there was discrepancy between patient's symptoms and clinical signs, clinical observation was given precedence. Each item was rated on 4 item scale (0, 1, 2, and 3). '0' indicating 'not or doubtfully present' and referred as normal.
The data were analyzed by using statistical package for social science-version 10.1 (SPSS-10). For categorical data, frequency, percentage and chi-square tests, and for continuous data, mean standard deviation, and t test were used.
| Result|| |
A majority of the patients had age of onset before 30 years (54%), male (76%), married (79%), living in joint family (71%), belonged rural area (59%), and educated between middle to intermediate level (74%) [Table 1].
The most common manic symptom was decrease in sleep (49%). Other symptoms were an increase in verbal activity (39%), hostility (37%), increase motor activity (33.33%), elevated mood (27.45%), inflated self-esteem (15.7%), and flight of idea (5.9%). Common side effects seen were tremor (25%) difficulty in concentration (7%) [Table 2].
The data analysis showed [Table 1] and [Table 2] that in the subsyndromal mania group a large number had lower age of onset (58.8%), male (82.4%), unemployed (23.5%), educated (80.4%), unmarried, and from lower socio-economic status as compared to the no-subsyndromal mania group. The no-subsyndromal mania groups had sizable percentages of person doing business (23.9%), uneducated (19.6%), and were married (86.9%) [Table 3].
The result showed no significant difference between the two groups in respect to current age, age at onset, duration of illness, number of episodes, and average duration of episode.
| Discussion|| |
Socio-demographic and clinical features of this study broadly coincide with the finding of the literature published from India. ,, Sex difference observed in this study may be because males suffer more, ,, and have greater severity, , with tendency for aggressive behavior,  and utilize mental health services more.  In Indian setup, sex differences could also be due to socio-cultural factors and stigma associated with females availing mental health service. The family's occupational and economic status observed in this study is in keeping with traditional Indian socio-cultural agrarian background. A greater number of educated patients reflect increased awareness and better identification of the illness, and thus seeking help. Interestingly our study found that 45% of patients had a family history of affective illness either in first and/or second-degree relative/s. This finding indicates the familial nature of bipolar disorder,  a more severe form,  associated with multiple episodes,  and early age at onset.
Frequency of depressive and manic symptoms
Most common manic symptoms observed were decreased, increased verbal activity, hostility, increased motor activity, and elevated mood which are comparable to findings observed in western countries. ,,
Common side effects observed in this study were tremor, difficulty in concentration, sedation, and orthostatic giddiness. These are well-known side effect of mood stabilizer used for prophylaxis. 
Out of all the patients, 51% had sub-syndromal manic symptoms in this study. Though few studies have failed to show any sub-syndromal symptoms in bipolar disorder in remission,  other studies have found such symptoms in up to 70% of the patients.  Such discrepancy may be related to methodology and to the scales used for assessment. Keller et al.  observed that these symptoms were due to inadequate doses of prophylactic medication (Lithium), while Goodnick et al.  found them to be independent of prophylactic medication.
Khanna et al.  found that in India recurrent manic pattern is more prevalent than typical bipolarity. Ram and Mathew  (1993) found that their patients had positive family history in up to 50% of cases, 53.3% having severe episode(s), and relatively unfavorable treatment response and with a tendency to have multiple episodes.
The patients with sub-syndrome tend to have early age at onset. They are more often male, unemployed, educated, unmarried, urban based, and from a joint family and lower socioeconomic status, and with a family history of affective illness. These variables are often reported to associate unfavorable outcome in bipolar disorder. Baur et al. , (2009) found that subsyndromal symptoms may preclude full-time responsibilities outside the home and suggested to incorporate these symptoms as outcome measure.
Group difference between patients with and without sub-syndromal
This study revealed no significant difference between those with and without sub-syndromal status, though there were relatively more patients with early age of onset, total duration in the sub-syndromal manic group. Harrow et al,  found such a relation after 6 months of an index episode. Exclusion of patient with comorbid disorder, that is known to be associated with subsyndrome,  may also result in such observations. The heterogeneous nature of the illness and combined effect of multiple factors may be associated with such symptoms.
On the basis of the above findings following conclusions can be drawn that sub-syndromal symptoms are common in patients with bipolar disorder and does not seem to be related to current age, age at onset, illness duration, number of episode and duration of illness.  This result may be more relevant to patient attending psychiatric hospital at a tertiary centre for follow up probably after treatment of severe episode of illness.
The cross sectional study design, the exclusion of premorbid temperament / personalities and psychosocial factor as part of assessment are some of the limitations of this study.
| References|| |
|1.||Paykel ES, Ramana R, Cooper Z, Hayhurst H, Kerr J, Baroka A. Residual symptoms after partial remission: An important outcome in depression. Psychol Med 1995;25:1171-80. |
|2.||Marangell LB. The importance of subsyndromal symptoms in bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:24-7. |
|3.||Keitner GI, Soloman DA, Ryan CE, Miller IW, Mallinger A, Kuppfer DJ, et al. Residual symptom to Bipolar I Disorder. Compr Psychiatry 1996;37:362-7. |
|4.||Kumar D, Basu D, Kulhara P, Sharan P. Psychosocial correlate of subsyndromal symptoms and functioning of bipolar patients stabilized on prophylactic lithium. Indian J Psychiatry 2001;43:199-205. |
|5.||Tohen M, Hennen J, Zarate CM, Baldessarini RJ, Strakowski SM, Stoll AL, et al. Two-year syndromal and functional recovery in 219 cases of first-episode major affective disorder with psychotic features. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157/2:220-8. |
|6.||Mac Vane JR, Lange JD, Brown WA, Zayat M. Psychological functioning of bipolar manic depressive in remission. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:1351-4. |
|7.||World health organization. The International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD 10). Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: WHO; 1993. |
|8.||Beck P, Kastrup M, Rafaelson OJ. Mini compendium of rating scale for state of anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM III symptoms. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986;73:326. |
|9.||Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56-62. |
|10.||Lingjaerde O, Ahlfors UG, Bech P. The UKU side effect rating scale: A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs, and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987;76:1-100. |
|11.||Kulhara P, Basu D, Mattoo SK, Sharan P, Chopra R. Lithium prophylaxis of recurrent bipolar affective disorder: Long-term outcome and its psychosocial correlates. J Affect Disord 1999;54/1-2:87-96. |
|12.||Khanna R, Gupta N, Shanker S. Course of bipolar disorder in eastern India. J Affect Disord 1992;24:35-41. |
|13.||Biswas SK, Mandal DK. The course and outcome of affective disorder: A perspective study. Ranchi: Dissertation submitted to Ranchi University; 1988. p. 88-92. |
|14.||Abram R, Taylor MA. Unipolar Mania. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974;30:441-3. |
|15.||Numberger J, Roos SP, Dunner DS, Fieve RR. Unipolar mania: A distinct clinical entity. Am J Psychiatry 1979;136:1420-3. |
|16.||Makanjuola RO. Recurrent unipolar manic disorder in yanuba, Nigerias: Further evidence. Br J Psychiatry 1986;147:434-7. |
|17.||Winokur G, Clayton PJ, Reich J. Manic depression illness, Mosby St. Louise Md. World health organization (1993) The ICD-10 classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World health organization; 1969. |
|18.||Angst J, Sellaro R. Historical perspectives and natural history of bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2000;15:445-57. |
|19.||Mendlewicz J, Fieve RR, Rainer JD, Fleiss JL. Manic depressive illness, comparative study of patient with and without family history. Br J Psychiatry 1972;120:523-30. |
|20.||Gershen ES, Liebowitz JH. Socio cultural and demographic correlation of affective in Jerusalem. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:37-50. |
|21.||Winokur G, Kadramas A. Polyepisodic course for bipolar illness: Possible clinical relationship. Compr Psychiatry 1989;30:121-7. |
|22.||Sclere P, Creed F. Life event and the onset of mania. Br J Psychiatry 1990;156:508-14. |
|23.||Wang G, Lam D. The development and validating of coping inventory for prodromes of mania. J Affect Disord 1999;53:57-65. |
|24.||Fava GA. Sub clinical symptoms in mood disorder: Pathophysiological theraputic implication. Psychol Med 1999;29:47-61. |
|25.||Horrow M, Joseph F. Outcome of manic disorder: A naturalistic follow up study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:665-71. |
|26.||Keller MB, Lavori PW, Kane JM, Galen Berg AJ, Rosenbau JF, Walzer EA, et al. Subsyndromal symptom in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:379-76. |
|27.||Goodnick PJ, Fieve RR, Baxter B. Predictor of interepisode symptom and relapse in affective disorder patient treated with lithium. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144:367-9. |
|28.||Ram D, Mathew T. A study of polyepisodic mania, clinical correlates. Ranchi: Dissertation submitted to Ranchi University; 1993. p. 57-9. |
|29.||Bauer M, Glenn T, Grof P, Schmid R, Pfennig A, Whybrow PC. Subsyndromal mood symptoms: A useful concept for maintenance studies of bipolar disorder? Psychopathology 2010;43:1-7. |
|30.||Bauer M, Glenn T, Grof P, Rasgon NL, Marsh W, Sagduyu K, et al. Frequency of subsyndromal symptoms and employment status in patients with bipolar disorder. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009;44:515-22. |
|31.||MacQueen MS, Marriott M, Begin H. Subsyndromal symptoms assessed in longitudinal, prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2003;5:349-55. |
Department of Psychiatry, JSS Medical College Hospital, MG Road, Mysore - 570 004
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]