Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 511 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2531    
    Printed77    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded545    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 244-248
Intervention for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled study


1 Department of Psychiatry, Voluntary Health Service, SNEHA, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Kent and Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust, Kent, United Kingdom
3 Vellore Institute of Technology, Katpadi, Vellore, India
4 Raju Hospitals, Chennai, India
5 TANSACS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2011
 

   Abstract 

Aim: To determine whether brief intervention and contact (BIC) is effective in reducing subsequent suicidal behavior among suicide attempters.
Materials and Methods: Suicide attempters (n=680) admitted in a general hospital in Chennai were randomly allocated to treatment as usual and BIC whose components include brief intervention at the time of discharge and contact for 18 months.
Results: Completed suicide was significantly lower in the BIC group, OR 35.4 (CI 18.4 - 78.2) as also attempted suicide, OR 17.3 (CI 10.8 - 29.7).
Conclusions: This low-cost intervention which can be readily implemented may be an important suicide prevention strategy in healthcare settings in India.

Keywords: Attempted suicide, intervention, randomized trial

How to cite this article:
Vijayakumar L, Umamaheswari C, Shujaath Ali ZS, Devaraj P, Kesavan K. Intervention for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled study. Indian J Psychiatry 2011;53:244-8

How to cite this URL:
Vijayakumar L, Umamaheswari C, Shujaath Ali ZS, Devaraj P, Kesavan K. Intervention for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled study. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Aug 19];53:244-8. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2011/53/3/244/86817



   Introduction Top


Suicide is a global public health problem. The majority of suicides (85%) in the world occur in low and middle-income countries. [1] Non-fatal suicide attempts occur mostly in young persons [2] and are up to 10-40 times more frequent than suicides. [3] Persons with a history of previous suicide attempt are at a high risk of dying by suicide [4,5] with up to 2% dying within one year [6],[7] and up to 7% within 10 years. [8]

Over 100,000 people die by suicide in India every year. [9] In the last two decades the suicide rate has increased from 7.9 to 10.8/100,000. Two large epidemiological verbal autopsy studies in rural Tamil Nadu revealed that the actual suicide rate is six to nine times the official rate. [10],[11] If these figures are extrapolated it is estimated that half a million suicides occur every year [12] and at least 5 million attempt suicide each year in India. [13]

There are many studies on attempted suicide in India that discuss the various sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial factors in attempted suicide [14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] but studies on interventions are sparse.

Most research about intervention for attempted suicides is conducted in developed countries and little is known about the burden of attempted suicide and effectiveness of intervention for suicide attempters in developing countries.

The SUicide-PREvention Multisite Intervention Study on Suicidal behaviors (SUPRE-MISS), launched by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000, aimed at increasing the knowledge about suicidal behaviors and the effectiveness of brief interventions for suicide attempters in culturally diverse places around the world and Chennai was the centre in India.

The brief intervention and contact (BIC) employed in the SUPRE-MISS trial is an adaptation of brief interventions used for alcohol problems. [21] Brief interventions were found to be effective in reducing alcohol-related problems and facilitating treatment referral of problem drinkers and in reducing suicide in high-risk patients. Regular contact has been found to reduce suicidal behavior in those who have attempted suicide. [22]

Compared to the usual psychological and medical interventions employed for suicide attempters, the advantage of this type of intervention is that it requires little space, equipment or highly trained personnel. Given the resource limitations of low and middle-income countries, interventions that involve highly trained staff are not feasible while BIC interventions are easily implementable. Consequently, the SUPRE-MISS study aimed at assessing the potential benefits of BIC as an add-on to the usual care for suicide attempters.

The current paper discusses the effectiveness of BIC in reducing suicides and attempted suicide in Chennai, India.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was carried out in the Government Royapettah General Hospital in Chennai. Persons who attempted suicide were initially seen in the emergency department and all were routinely admitted to the intensive medical care unit of the hospital. All those over the age of 12 years who attempted suicide, identified from January 2002 to January 2004, were invited to participate in the study. Those who agreed were interviewed after obtaining informed consent.

The interviews were conducted face-to-face and took place in the intensive medical care unit. Two experienced psychiatrists conducted the interview after the interviewee was medically stable, at the most three days after admission. Those who were over the age of 12 years and were medically unable to give consent or interview or refused were excluded. The study was approved by the ethics committee.

The 680 enrolled participants were randomly assigned to the BIC (n=320) or treatment as usual (TAU) (n=360) group. The allocation sequence was based on random number table and maintained in a separate location to ensure that the clinician responsible for the assignment of the subject could not bias the assignment throughout the duration of study.

Brief intervention and contact

The BIC procedure included a standard one-hour individual information session as close to the time of discharge as possible combined with periodic follow-up contacts after discharge. The individual session provided information about the psychological and social distress that often underlies suicidal behavior, risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors, basic community-specific epidemiology of suicide, repetition of suicidal behaviors, alternatives for constructive instead of self-destructive coping strategies, and contacts/referral options. Follow-up contacts involved visits at 1 week, 2, 4, 7, 11 weeks and 4, 6, 12 and 18 months after discharge.

During each visit the subjects in the BIC group were asked how they felt and whether they perceived the need for any support. If they reported needing support they would be referred to an appropriate service agency. If a person denied the need for support, but was considered to be at current suicide risk, referral to a local treatment service was suggested. These visits were conducted by two psychologists with a one-day special training and documented using a short one-page form. The goal was to "check-in" with the patients and to determine their current status. If the individual had died, the cause of death as reported by relatives or other informants was recorded; if the individual was alive, information on subsequent suicide attempts (if any) was recorded.

Treatment as usual

The TAU modality was based on the norms prevailing in the hospital. Typically, treatment was limited to acute management of the somatic squeal of the suicide attempt and did not include psychiatric or psychological assessment or treatment, or any psychological or social consultation. If there were no physical complications, patients were usually discharged after somatic treatment was completed, typically within 24 h. Rarely, patients were discharged with a referral to outpatient mental health services. Subjects in the TAU group were contacted at six months and eighteen months after discharge to assess the suicidal behaviour using the same questionnaire used for the BIC group. [Figure 1] shows the flow chart of persons recruited and followed for 18 months.
Figure 1: Flow chart of recruitment

Click here to view


Instruments

The questionnaire, based on the European Parasuicide Study Interview Schedule (EPSIS) of the WHO/EURO multicentre study on suicidal behavior was used. [23] It covered detailed sociodemographic information, the history of suicidal behavior and family data, physical health, contact with health services, mental health, questions related to social support, substance use, hopelessness, traumatic events, legal problems, antisocial behavior, Beck suicide intent scale, Beck depression inventory, Spielberger trait anger scale, WHO wellbeing index, WHO psychiatric disability assessment schedule and Eysenk Impulsiveness Scale.

All the instruments were translated, backtranslated and field-tested in the regional language and the interviewers were trained in the administration of the instruments. Appropriate statistical measures and tests were carried out using the SPSS Version 13. Detailed description of the method and instruments can be ascertained in a prior publication. [24]


   Results Top


The study tried to include all suicide attempters consequently seen at the emergency care department. Various factors like rapid departure of the patients, delayed notification of research staff, inadequate recording, constraints in hospitalization, etc. made it difficult to include all eligible patients. Other reasons were refusals, clinical condition not allowing an interview, leaving against medical advice etc. Hence out of the eligible 1691 persona only 680 (40%) were enrolled for the study. Those who did not participate in the study were similar in age and sex to those who participated.

There were no significant differences between the BIC and TAU groups in sociodemographic factors like age, sex, marital status, educational status, employment status and religion as shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Sociodemographic variables


Click here to view


The groups were also comparable in the duration of stay in the hospital, history of previous suicide attempt, number of previous attempts and family history of suicide and suicide attempt [Table 2]. Also, there was no difference in the method used. [Table 3] reveals that there were no differences in the psychological and clinical variables, thus suggesting that the BIC and TAU groups are comparable.
Table 2: Suicide history


Click here to view
Table 3: Clinical Factors


Click here to view


Completed and attempted suicide was found to be significantly lower in the BIC group after intervention at 18 months' follow-up compared to the TAU group [Table 4].
Table 4: Post intervention


Click here to view


In the intervention group, the one completed suicide occurred in the first week itself. While in the TAU group, five occurred before six months and four before 18 months. One attempted suicide occurred in Week 1, three at six months, one at 12 months and three at 18 months during followup in the BIC group while in the TAU group there were three attempts in six months and 14 at 18 months' follow-up.

Only 2.5% of persons followed up felt that the visits were a disturbance. The visits were considered supportive and helpful by 65%.


   Discussion Top


For the first time a randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of BIC in suicide attempters with suicide and attempted suicide as the primary outcome measure has been carried out in India. The findings demonstrate that a brief intervention session combined with a systematic long-term contact after discharge can have a positive effect on preventing subsequent suicide and suicide attempts. BIC might have acted in a variety of ways to reduce suicidality by acting as a social support network; by increasing awareness about the problems that led to the suicidal act and hence helping in formulating an alternate coping mechanism, by enhancing a feeling of 'connectedness' and a feeling of being 'cared for'.

Carter et al., [25] have also shown in a randomized trial that intervention using postcards reduced repetition of hospital-treated deliberate self-harm poisoning. Fleischmann et al., (2008) [26] have shown that mortality was reduced in the BIC group compared to the TAU group in all the five sites of the SUPRE-MISS study.

The study has several limitations. Only 40% of eligible patients were recruited for the study. The problem of accurate collection of data in India is compounded by the fact that attempted suicide continues to be a punishable offence unlike in the majority of the countries in the world. The follow-up of subjects proved to be a major challenge due to the complex setting and high mobility. It was time-consuming to trace the subjects and identify their whereabouts. So ideally although the TAU group should have been seen only after 18 months, they were seen at six months and 18 months to reduce the number of "lost to follow-up" patients. Another limitation was that the ascertainment of suicidal behavior during follow-up was from the subject and family members with no corroborating official records.

BIC is not the only strategy to reduce suicidal behavior. Maselk and Patel [27] have suggested that combination strategies that reduce domestic violence, provide poverty relief and strengthen the health system in identification and treatment of mental disorders will contribute to the reduction of suicidal behavior, particularly in women.


   Conclusion Top


Taking into consideration the human and economic resource limitations in India, interventions like BIC are readily implementable in the healthcare sector. BIC can be a cost-effective strategy to reduce subsequent suicidal behavior after a suicide attempt.

This paper is based on the data and experience obtained during the participation of the authors in the WHO Multisite Intervention Study on Suicidal Behaviours (SUPRE-MISS), a projected funded by the World Health Organization and the participating field research centres. The collaborating investigators in this study were (in alphabetical order): Dr. J. Bolhari, Tehran, Prof. N. Botega, Campinas; Dr. D. De Silva, Colombo, Prof. V.T. Nguyen, Hanoi, Dr. M. Phillips, Beijing; Prof. L. Schlebusch, Durban, Dr. A. Varnik, Tallinn; and Dr. L. Vijayakumar, Chennai. Dr. J.M. Bertolote and Dr. A. Fleischmann coordinated the project at WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Prof. D. De Leo, Brisbane and Prof. D. Wsserman, Stockholm acted as sciedntific advisors. We are grateful to Mrs. Bhanumathi who was responsible for data entry and Dr. Raman for statistical analysis.

 
   References Top

1.Krug EG, Dahlborg L, Mercy JA, Zwi AD, Lozano R. World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Hulten A, Wasserman D, Hawton K, Jiang GX, Salender-Renberg E, Schimidtke A, et al. Recommended care for young people (15-19 years) after suicide attempts in certain European countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;9:100-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Schimidtke A, Bille Brahe U, De Leo D, Kerkhof A, Bierke J, Crepet P,et al. Attempted suicide in Europe: Rates and trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992. Results of WHO/EURO Multi centre study on para suicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;93:327-38.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Gunnell D, Frankel S. Prevention of suicide: Aspirations and evidence. BMJ 1994;308:1227-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Harris EC, Barraclough B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1997;170:205-28.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Beautrais AL. Subsequent mortality in medically serious suicide attempts: A 5 year follow-up. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003;37:595-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Hawton K, Fagg J. Suicide and other causes of death, following attempted suicide. Br J Psychiatry 1988;152:359-66.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Owens D, Horrocks J, House A. Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:193-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Accidental and Suicidal deaths in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2008  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Gajalakshmi V, Peto R. Suicide rates in Tamil Nadu, South India: Verbal autopsy of 39,000 deaths in 1997-1998. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:203-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Joseph A, Abraham S, Muliyil JP, George K, Prasad J, Minz S, et al. Evaluation of suicide rates in rural India using verbal autopsies, 1994-1999. BMJ 2003;326:1121-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Vijayakumar L. Suicide and its prevention: The urgent need in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2007;49:81-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Vijayakumar L, Zubaid A, AliS S, Umamaheswari C. Sociocultural and clinical factors in repetition of suicide attempts: A study from India. Int J Cult Ment Health 2008;1:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Narang RL, Mishra BP, Mohan N. Attempted suicide in Ludhiana. Indian J Psychiatry 2000;42:83-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
15.Srivastava AS, Kumar R. Suicidal ideation and attempts in patients with major depression: Socio demographic and clinical variables. Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:225-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
16.Ponnudurai R, Jeyakar J, Saraswathy M. Attempted suicides in Madras. Indian J Psychiatry 1986;28:59-62  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Suresh Kumar PN. An analysis of suicide attempters versus completers in Kerala. Indian J Psychiatry 2004;46:144-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Chowdhary AN, Banerjee S, Brahma A, Biswas MK. Pesticide poisoning in non fatal deliberate self harm: A public health issue. Indian J Psychiatry 2007;49:262-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Sudhir Kumar C, Chandrasekharan R. A study of psychosocial and clinical factors associated with adolescent suicide attempts. Indian J Psychiatry 2000;42:237-42.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Venkoba RA. Attempted suicide and suicide among students in Madurai. Indian J Psychiatry 1972;14:389-97.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC. Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Drinking: A manual for Use in Primary Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Motto JA, Bostrom AG. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post crisis Suicide Prevention. Psychiatr Serv 2001;52:828-33.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
23.Kerkhof A, Bernasco W, Bille-Brahe U, Platt S, Schmidtke A. European Parasuicide Study Interview Schedule (EPSIS). In Facts and Figures: WHO/EURO (ed. U. Bille-Brahe). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1999  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A, DeLeo D, Phillips M, Botega N, Desilva D,et al. Characteristics of attempted suicides seen in emergency care settings of general hospitals in eight low and middle income countries. Psychol Med 2005;35:1467-74.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Carter GL, Clover K, Whyte IM, Dawson AH, D'Este C. Postcards from the Edge project: randomized controlled trial of an Intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning. BMJ 2005;331:805.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
26.Fleischmann A, Bertolote JM, Wasserman D, De Leo D, Bolhari J, Botega NJ, et al. Effectiveness of brief intervention and contact for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled trial in five countries. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:703-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
27.Mazelk J, Patel V. Why women attempt suicide the role of mental illness and social disadvantage in a community cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:817-22.  Back to cited text no. 27
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Lakshmi Vijayakumar
25, Ranjith Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai - 600 085, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.86817

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide
A. J. Milner,G. Carter,J. Pirkis,J. Robinson,M. J. Spittal
The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2015; 206(3): 184
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Brief psychological intervention after self-harm: randomised controlled trial from Pakistan
N. Husain,S. Afsar,J. Ara,H. Fayyaz,R. u. Rahman,B. Tomenson,M. Hamirani,N. Chaudhry,B. Fatima,M. Husain,F. Naeem,I. B. Chaudhry
The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2014; 204(6): 462
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Pyrethroid deltamethrin-induced developmental neurodegenerative cerebral injury and ameliorating effect of dietary glycoside naringin in male wistar rats
Vinayagam Magendira Mani,Sivaji Asha,Abdul Majeeth Mohamed Sadiq
Biomedicine & Aging Pathology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Suicide: An Indian perspective
Radhakrishnan, R. and Andrade, C.
Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2012; 54(4): 304-319
[Pubmed]



 

Top