Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 4031 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
Search Again
 Back
 Table of Contents
 
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5272    
    Printed121    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded949    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 134-137

Twenty-five years of schizophrenia: The Madras longitudinal study


Director of Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Thara Rangaswamy
13, Lloyds Road, I lane, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.99531

Rights and Permissions

Aim: To determine the 25 year follow-up of subjects originally enrolled in the "Study of factors associated with course and outcome of schizophrenia" (SOFACOS) at Chennai. Materials and Methods: All subjects who were followed up were administered the same research tools which were done at inclusion, namely the PSE & PPHS. Results: At the end of 25 years, 47 of the original ninety subjects were assessed completely. Twenty five (26%) had died and 18 (20%) were lost to follow-up during the 25 year period. 32 of the 47 followed up were in partial or total remission. Outcome was good in 27.7%, intermediate in 52% and poor in 19%. More men were single and more women were either married or separated. Gender differences were not marked. Conclusions: This is one of the few prospective, long term follow up studies from India. Although outcome was good in those followed up, the numbers who died and could not be followed up causes concern.



[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*

        

Print this article         Email this article