Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 2403 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1491    
    Printed33    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded212    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
BRIEF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 376-379
The course and outcome of alcohol use disorders in men in Goa: A population- based follow-up study


1 Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Sangath, Goa
2 Sangath, Goa
3 South Asia Network for Chronic Disease, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India; Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication25-Oct-2013
 

   Abstract 

Background: Research on the natural history and long-term outcomes of alcohol use disorders (AUD) is important to guide health policy. However, attrition is a major challenge in longitudinal studies and can affect validity of findings.
Materials and Methods: A 4-year follow-up study was conducted on a randomly selected subgroup of a sample of men in rural and urban communities in Goa to assess attrition, preliminary estimates of AUD outcomes, and chronic disease risk factors.
Results: Overall attrition rate was 16.7% with a higher attrition in AUD compared to abstainers or casual drinkers. Incidence of AUD at 4 years was 12.8% while the persistence rate of AUD was 53.9%. A trend for poorer health and health behaviors and higher blood pressure was observed in AUD.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest a relatively low attrition rate despite the long follow-up period and support the feasibility of conducting a definitive cohort study with the entire sample.

Keywords: Alcohol use disorders, attrition, health outcomes, incidence

How to cite this article:
Nadkarni A, Bhat B, Ebrahim S, Patel V. The course and outcome of alcohol use disorders in men in Goa: A population- based follow-up study . Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:376-9

How to cite this URL:
Nadkarni A, Bhat B, Ebrahim S, Patel V. The course and outcome of alcohol use disorders in men in Goa: A population- based follow-up study . Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 10];55:376-9. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2013/55/4/376/120573



   Introduction Top


The pattern of drinking in India is characterized by relatively high abstention rates and high rates of AUD among those who do drink. [1],[2] This epidemiological pattern is associated with high rates of alcohol-attributable mortality and prevalence of AUDs, relative to the per capita alcohol consumption. [1] However, AUDs remain low on the Indian health policy agenda [3] and this could partly be due to the limited evidence on the impact of AUDs on health and socioeconomic outcomes. [2],[4]

Evidence on the natural history and long-term outcomes of AUDs is of value to health policy makers. Such studies in developed countries have reported high rates of persistence of AUD and adverse health and social outcomes. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] However, one of the challenges of conducting such studies is attrition. Attrition represents a potential threat of bias, if those who drop out of the study are systematically different from those who remain in the study, which is plausible in the context of AUD. There is now a general consensus that loss of contact with more than 30% of the original sample over the course of a cohort study is unacceptable and will compromise the validity of conclusions drawn. [13]

The goal of this study was to estimate the attrition rates and reasons for attrition in a randomly selected subsample of a community cohort to inform the feasibility and methodology of a definitive evaluation of the course and outcomes of AUD in this population. We also planned to determine the participant's current drinking status, co-occurrence of chronic disease risk factors, health outcomes, and acceptability of collection of blood samples in future studies.


   Materials and Methods Top


Setting

The study was conducted in the northern district of the state of Goa, India. The urban study areas included two beach areas popular among tourists and one urban residential area in Bardez taluka. The rural study areas include six contiguous villages in Sattari and Bicholim talukas.

Sample

In 2006, the Alcohol Research Group (USA) and Sangath, Goa, conducted the SAAHAS study, which included a cross-sectional survey in the populations mentioned above. [14],[15] Of the 1899 males that were screened for SAAHAS, 1859 (97.9%) consented or had not explicitly refused consent for follow-up contact. Alcohol use was assessed using the AUDIT. [16] It has been validated in India [17] and also specifically in Goa. [18] The WHO prescribed cut-off of 8 on AUDIT was used for detecting AUD. Participants who drank alcohol below this cut-off were coded as casual drinkers. Self-report of not having consumed any alcohol in the past year was coded as being abstainer. We selected a random sample of 50 men (25 each from rural and urban communities), from each of these subcategories, using random number tables, giving a total sample size of 150 men. As these data was collected in 2010 our outcomes were assessed roughly 4 years following baseline measurement.

Measurements

A questionnaire measuring attrition, alcohol use, and common chronic disease risk factors was developed, and translated into the vernacular, i.e., Konkani, Hindi, and Marathi.

Chronic disease risk factors included questions related to physical activity, disability, mobility, smoking, and self-reported anxiety or depression. Blood pressure was measured using a digital sphygmomanometer which met the standards of the International Validation Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). [19] Weight was measured using digital weighing scales and height was measured using a portable stadiometer.

If the respondent was unavailable after five follow-up attempts, had migrated to a different area which was unreachable by the team, had died or refused to participate, then he was considered as lost to follow-up and the reason for refusal or reason for loss to follow-up was recorded.

Ethics

Ethical approval was obtained from Sangath's Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from each respondent and men with AUD were offered feedback and advice about help-seeking from Sangath or the public health system.

Analyses

Categorical variables were summarized in the form of frequencies and proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All outcomes were analyzed separately for the three exposure groups. Analyses were performed using STATA 10.0 for Windows.


   Results Top


Attrition rates

The overall attrition was 16.7% (95% CI 11.1-23.6). The reasons for attrition were as follows: address could not be traced 3.3%, migrated out of study area 6%, refused consent 5.3% and unavailable after five follow-up attempts 2%. The attrition in the urban centers was 28% (n = 21, 95% CI 18.2-39.6) and in the rural centers it was 5.3% (n = 4, 95% CI 2.2-14.9), P < 0.001. The attrition according to drinking status at baseline was 12% (95% CI 4.5-24.3) in abstainers, 16% (95% CI 7.2-29.1) in casual drinkers and 22% (95% CI 11.5-36) in AUD.

Drinking outcomes at follow-up

Of the 86 abstainers/casual drinkers at baseline 12.8% (95% CI 6.6-21.7) were classified as AUD at follow-up with a higher incidence among casual drinkers (6.8%, 95% CI 1.4-18.7 in abstinent vs 19.1%, 95% CI 8.6-34.1, in casual drinkers). Of those who had AUD at baseline 53.9% (95% CI 38.3-71.4) were classified as persistent AUD at follow-up.

Chronic disease risk factors

[Table 1] compares the various chronic disease risk factors between abstainers, casual drinkers and hazardous drinkers. Compared to abstainers or casual drinkers, a higher proportion of those with AUD had self-reported history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chest pain or discomfort, moderate to severe general body pain, and shortness of breath. A slightly higher proportion of those with AUD were current smokers compared to casual drinkers or abstainers. A higher proportion of those with AUD (3.1%) were not physically active compared to abstainers (2.2%) and casual drinkers (2.1%). A higher proportion of AUD had problems with daily activities and mobility compared to the other two groups. Participants with AUD reported higher levels of moderate-to-severe anxiety or depression compared to abstainers and casual drinkers. The mean diastolic BP in AUD was higher than in casual drinkers and abstainers. The mean systolic BP in casual drinkers (130.1; 95% CI 126.5-133.9) was higher than in AUD (129.8; 95% CI 125.3-134.2) and abstainers (124.1; 95% CI 119.5-128.6). The mean BMI in casual drinkers was higher than in AUD and abstainers.
Table 1: Chronic diseases and risk factors

Click here to view


Other outcomes

A total of 96% of the pilot study participants were willing to participate in a further follow-up in 2 years time and 91.2% expressed a willingness to undergo blood tests as a part of follow-up.


   Discussion Top


The overall attrition rate in our sample was less than 20% at 4 years, the highest attrition being in AUD and lowest in abstainers; higher attrition was also observed in urban communities. Thus, we had a reasonably good retention rate at 4 years compared to previous longitudinal studies of drug and alcohol use which have reported attrition rates from 13% to 25% at 1 year. [20],[21] A meta-analysis of longitudinal psychoactive substance prevention studies reported that on average 78.3% of participants were retained at 6 months, 73.4% after a year and 71.% after 2 years, suggesting that the largest attrition tends to occur during the first 6 months of a study. [22] Our attrition rate could be further reduced if we had resources to trace individuals who had migrated.

The incidence of AUD in our sample at 4 years was 12.8%. The only community-based Indian study that we identified reported an annual incidence rate of alcohol use disorders to be 4.2%. [23] In our sample, the abstinence rate in AUD was only 5.1% at 4 years. In the context of limited health services and large treatment gaps for AUDs, this is likely to approximate the rate of untreated abstinence. We do not have comparable studies in Indian populations but studies in developed countries in untreated samples report remission rates of 2-3% [24],[25] at 1 year to 30% at 15 years. [26]

A higher proportion of those with AUD had adverse health and lifestyle outcomes compared to the other two groups. Although these findings are consistent with other studies [18],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37] our small sample size restricts any inferences that we can draw from them. However, these findings do show a clear trend that AUD at baseline is associated with long-term adverse health outcomes; these findings coupled with those of low attrition strengthen the case for conducting a definitive longitudinal study exploring the long-term course and outcome of AUD.


   Acknowledgment Top


This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust through the South Asia Network for Chronic Diseases of the Public Health Foundation of India and the LSHTM. Vikram Patel is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship. Abhijit Nadkarni is supported by a Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowship.

 
   References Top

1.Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet 2009;373:2223-33.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Prasad R. Alcohol use on the rise in India. Lancet 2009;373:17-18.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:858-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Caetano R, Laranjeira R. A 'perfect storm' in developing countries: economic growth and the alcohol industry. Addiction 2006;101:149-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Gual A, Bravo F, Lligona A, Colom J. Treatment for alcohol dependence in Catalonia: Health outcomes and stability of drinking patterns over 20 years in 850 patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:409-15.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Mann K, Schäfer DR, Längle G, Ackermann K, Croissant B. The long-term course of alcoholism, 5, 10 and 16 years after treatment. Addiction 2005;100:797-805.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.McCabe RJR. Alcohol dependent individuals sixteen years on. Alcohol Alcohol 1986;21:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.O'Connor A, Daly J. Alcoholics. A twenty year follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry 1985;146:645-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Hyman M. Alcoholics 15 Years Later. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1976;273:613-23.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Finney J, Moos R. The long-term course of treated alcoholism: I. Mortality, relapse and remission rates and comparisons with community controls. J Stud Alcohol 1991;52:44-54.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Gerdner A, Berglund M. Mortality of treated alcoholics after eight years in relation to short-term outcome. Alcohol Alcohol 1997;32:573-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Duckitt A, Brown D, Edwards G, Oppenheimer E, Sheehan M, Taylor C. Alcoholism and the nature of outcome. Br J Addict 1985;80:153-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.McLellan AT, Woody GE, Metzger D. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. In: Egerton JA, Fox DM, Leshner A, editors. Treating drug abusers effectively. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Nayak MB, Bond JC, Cherpitel C, Patel V, Greenfield TK. Detecting alcohol-related problems in developing countries: A comparison of 2 screening measures in India. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009;33:2057-66.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Nayak MB, Kerr W, Greenfield TK, Pillai A. Not all drinks are created equal: Implications for alcohol assessment in India. Alcohol Alcohol 2008;43:713-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 1993;88:791-804.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Babu RS, Sengupta SN, Sateesh Babu R. A study of problem drinkers in a general hospital. Indian J Psychiatry 1997;39:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
18.Silva MC, Gaunekar G, Patel V, Kukalekar DS, Fernandes J. The prevalence and correlates of hazardous drinking in industrial workers: A study from Goa, India. Alcohol Alcohol 2003;38:79-83.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Belghazi J, Feghali RN, Moussalem T, Rejdych M, Asmar RG. Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2007;3:389-400.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Aldridge J, Parker H, Measham F. Drug trying and drug use across adolescence: A longitudinal study of young people's drug taking in two regions of northern England. Drugs prevention advisory service paper 1. London: Home Office; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Botvin GJ, Baker E, Filazzola AD, Botvin EM. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990;15:47-63.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Hansen WB, Tobler NS, Graham JW. Attrition in substance abuse prevention research: A meta-analysis of 85 longitudinally followed cohorts. Eval Rev 1990;14:677-85.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Mohan D, Chopra A, Sethi H. Incidence estimates of substance use disorders in a cohort from Delhi, India. Indian J Med Res 2002;115:128-35.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Gual A, Bravo F, Lligona A, Colom J. Treatment for alcohol dependence in Catalonia: Health outcomes and stability of drinking patterns over 20 years in 850 patients. Alcohol Alcohol 2009;44:409-15.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Vaillant GE. The natural history of alcoholism revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Öjesjö L. Long-term outcome in alcohol abuse and alcoholism among males in the Lundby general population, Sweden. Br J Addict 1981;76:391-400.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.MacMahon S. Alcohol consumption and hypertension. Hypertension 1987;9:111-21.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Sisson JH. Alcohol and airways function in health and disease. Alcohol 2007;41:293-307.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Howard AA, Arnsten JH, Gourevitch MN. Effect of alcohol consumption on Diabetes Mellitus. Ann Inter Med 2004;140:211-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Paavola M, Vartiainen E, Haukkala A. Smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity: A 13-year longitudinal study ranging from adolescence into adulthood. J Adolesc Health 2004;35:238-44.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Battjes RJ. Smoking as an issue in alcohol and drug abuse treatment. Addict Behav 1988;13:225-30.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Di Franza JR, Guerreram P. Alcoholism and smoking. J Stud Alcohol 1990;51:130-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Ogburn E, Grant BF. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:830-42.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, Locke BZ, Keith SJ, Judd LL, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. JAMA 1990;264:2511-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Upmark M, Hemmingsson T, Romelsjo A, Lundberg I, Allebeck P. Predictors of disability pension among young men: The role of alcohol and psychosocial factors. Eur J Public Health 1997;7:20-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.D'Costa G, Nazareth I, Naik D, Vaidya R, Levy G, Patel V, et al. Harmful alcohol use in Goa, India, and its associations with violence: A study in primary care. Alcohol Alcohol 2007;42:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Gaunekar G, Patel V, Rane A. The impact and patterns of hazardous drinking amongst male industrial workers in Goa, India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:267-75.  Back to cited text no. 37
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Abhijit Nadkarni
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.120573

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top