Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 2620 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
Search Again
 Table of Contents
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded475    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Year : 2015  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 165-173

Stigma of mental illness: An interventional study to reduce its impact in the community

The Richmond Fellowship Post Graduate College for Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Ashoknagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S Kalyanasundaram
The Richmond Fellowship Society (India), Bangalore Branch, 'Asha', 501, 47th Cross, 9th Main, 5th Block Jayanagar, Bangalore - 560 041, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.158175

Rights and Permissions

Background: Research literature has documented the nature of stigma associated with mental illness (MI) and its consequences in all spheres of life of ill persons and their families. It is also suggested that there is a need to develop intervention strategies to reduce stigma. However, very little is reported about these initiatives in the Indian context. Aim: To understand the nature of stigma associated with MI in a rural and semi-urban community in India and to develop an intervention package and study its impact. Materials and Methods: The study adopted a pre- and post-experimental/action research design with a random sample of community members including persons with chronic MI and their caregivers from rural and semi-urban areas. A semi structured interview schedule was used to assess the nature of stigma. An intervention package, developed on the basis of initial findings, was administered, and two post assessments were carried out. Results: Stigmatized attitude related to various aspects of MI were endorsed by the respondents. Caregivers had less stigmatizing attitude than the members of the community. Postintervention assessments (PIAs) revealed significant changes in attitudes towards some aspects of MI and this improved attitude was sustained during the second PIA, that is, after 3 months of intervention. Conclusion: People in the rural and semi-urban community have stigmatizing attitude toward MI. Intervention package focusing on the relevant aspect of MI can be used for reducing stigma of MI.



Print this article         Email this article