Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 2384 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed845    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTERS TO EDITOR  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 436
Delving into the perpetual debate in psychiatry


Department of Psychiatry, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2015
 

How to cite this article:
Sethi S, Walia V. Delving into the perpetual debate in psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry 2015;57:436

How to cite this URL:
Sethi S, Walia V. Delving into the perpetual debate in psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Apr 4];57:436. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2015/57/4/436/171853


Sir,

Article titled “Age of onset of dependence-Does it help our understanding of opioid dependence by generating categories or by acting as a useful dimension? A critical examination of the classic debate in psychiatry"[1] made an interesting reading. The debate about the categorical versus dimensional approach to diagnosis in psychiatry was termed as the classical debate by Kraemer et al.,[2] the debate that would help us to understand the nature and etiology of psychiatric disorders. Using the case of age of onset of opioid dependence (AOOD) authors have attempted to analyze this debate. As suggested by the authors, AOOD is indeed a very simple and clinician friendly variable. Previously De et al.[3] also used the same variable to classify the patients into two subtypes: Early onset (EO) with a mean AOOD 21 years and late onset (LO) with mean AOOD 27 years. Based on this finding, authors divided the study sample into two groups: EO <20 years and LO >22 years, omitting the year 21 just because the study by De et al.[3] showed that AOOD tended to peak around age 21 years. This omission brings in a methodological issue of creating “categories” out of a continuous variable of age. Recall bias is a common problem, and when two groups have almost no gap, that is, 20 years versus 22 years, one can easily fall into the “other” category. [Table 4] of the article [1] depicts this nicely and also points out the problem of recall bias, that is, age of onset of opioid use and AOOD are not very different, especially for EO group.

Further such narrow (age wise) categories were bound to yield no difference. It is very understandable that age gap of 1 or 2 years would not affect the variables under study. Wider age gaps probably would have given us more insight into the issue at hand, as well as a very simple variable AOOD, would have settled the classical debate.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Basu D, Ghormode D, Madan R, Mattoo S, Nehra R, Prabhakar S. Age of onset of dependence: Does it help our understanding of opioid dependence by generating meaningful categories or by acting as a useful dimension? A critical examination of the classic debate in psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry 2014;56:228-37.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Kraemer HC, Noda A, O'Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: Methodological challenges. J Psychiatry Res 2004;38:17-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
De B, Mattoo SK, Basu D. Role of age of onset of opioid dependence in subtyping opioid dependent educated male patients. Am J Addict 2003;12:336-45.  Back to cited text no. 3
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sujata Sethi
Department of Psychiatry, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.171853

Rights and Permissions




 

Top