Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 1133 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page


    Advanced search

    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded163    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents    
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 351-352
Internet addiction disorder: Hype, a myth

Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Secunderabad, Telangana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Oct-2016

How to cite this article:
Bipeta R. Internet addiction disorder: Hype, a myth. Indian J Psychiatry 2016;58:351-2

How to cite this URL:
Bipeta R. Internet addiction disorder: Hype, a myth. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 16];58:351-2. Available from:


The article on internet addiction (IA),[1] published in your journal, made for an interesting read. The authors embrace the idea that although IA is a disorder, it should not be diagnosed if such behavior is exclusively contained within the boundaries of, say, bipolar, depressive, or anxiety episodes and it spontaneously resolves after the resolution of such conditions. The authors also argue that the high rate of comorbidity seen in “IA” patients reflects the similarity of behavioral disorders (”such as IA”) with addictive disorders. They relegate the concept that IA is a manifestation of an underlying disorder since addiction as a gestalt may have characteristics beyond each of the individual phenomena commonly seen in substance use disorders such as impulsivity, obsessiveness, and compulsiveness.

In context to the above, I would like to emphasize that in many of the IA studies, the approach to the “IA patient” has been essentially inappropriate. An easy approach is selecting from a population, a subset, such as adolescents,[2] administering IA diagnostic criteria, obtaining a score, and labeling all those who score above the cutoff as “internet addicted.” The lack of a thorough psychopathological evaluation of an IA patient by a qualified mental health professional (MHP) may lead to comorbid/underlying conditions going undiagnosed. In my view, a methodologically sound approach would be an extensive, direct, face-to-face clinical interview,[3] administering appropriate IA diagnostic instruments, and addressing medical and psychiatric comorbidities by means of structured diagnostic schedules. Such IA patients should be treated for the underlying condition, if any, and followed up to establish the temporal stability of the diagnosis of IA. Evidence exists that in case of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) patients, improvement in the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores with the treatment of OCD is accompanied with the improvement of IA test scores as well as resolution of IA with OCD treatment.[4] It remains to be seen whether treatment of other comorbid conditions can also improve and resolve IA. This study,[4] like many other studies, underscores the importance of assessing the IA patient clinically for comorbid/underlying conditions. An accurate diagnosis is essential for administering appropriate treatment, and such diagnosis and treatment in the field of mental health should only be performed by medically qualified and trained MHPs such as psychiatrists or clinical psychologists.

This approach is also significant from the Indian context since India has a huge mental health burden and with progressively increasing access to the internet, patients with hitherto undiagnosed psychopathological disorders may have IA as their presenting symptoms.

In my opinion, IA to a maximum extent is a manifestation of underlying/comorbid psychopathology. Internet addiction is hype, a myth, and at this point of time, it does not merit inclusion as a standalone psychiatric disorder. As Pies,[5] eloquently puts it, “the so-called IA should not be written off as another attempt by psychiatry to 'medicalize' unfortunate or self-destructive behaviors.”


I thank Ms. Romana Zulfiqar, Romed Communications, New Delhi, India, for copy editing and proofreading this manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Dalal PK, Basu D. Twenty years of internet addiction Quo Vadis? Indian J Psychiatry 2016;58:6-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Tan Y, Chen Y, Lu Y, Li L. Exploring associations between problematic internet use, depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance among Southern Chinese adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13:313.  Back to cited text no. 2
Beard KW, Wolf EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 2001;4:377-83.  Back to cited text no. 3
Bipeta R, Yerramilli SS, Karredla AR, Gopinath S. Diagnostic stability of internet addiction in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Data from a naturalistic one-year treatment study. Innov Clin Neurosci 2015;12:14-23.  Back to cited text no. 4
Pies R. Should DSM-V designate internet addiction a mental disorder? Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2009;6:31-7.  Back to cited text no. 5

Correspondence Address:
Rajshekhar Bipeta
Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Secunderabad, Telangana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.192000

Rights and Permissions