Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 1952 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1354    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded167    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 100-105
What they think of us: A study of teaching medical specialists' attitude towards psychiatry in India


1 Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
2 Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Apr-2017
 

   Abstract 

Context: Attitudes of teaching medical specialists are important in shaping medical students' attitudes toward psychiatry. Data on attitudes of teaching medical specialists of India toward psychiatry are limited.
Aims: The aim was to study the attitude of teaching medical specialists of an academic medical center in East India toward psychiatry.
Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study.
Materials and Methods: We administered attitude toward psychiatry-30 (ATP 30) scale to teaching medical specialists of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, based on convenience sampling. Of 104 specialists contacted, 88 returned the completed questionnaire.
Statistical Analysis: We carried out descriptive statistical analysis and expressed results in mean and standard deviation. We analyzed the association of demographic characteristics, specialization, and duration of professional experience with total ATP scores using Chi-square test. We used subgroup analysis to compare mean ATP scores in different demographic and professional groups. We used independent t-test and ANOVA for between group comparisons.
Results: The response rate was 84.62% with a mean ATP score of 88.60. Female gender and having a family member with mental illness was significantly associated with favorable ATP. Notable findings were that 97% of participants were favorable toward patients with psychiatric illness, 90% felt psychiatric interventions as effective whereas 87% found psychiatry unappealing and 52% said that they would not have liked to be a psychiatrist.
Conclusions: While favorable attitudes toward patients with psychiatric illness and psychiatric interventions may mean better patient care; unfavorable attitudes toward psychiatry as a career choice may adversely affect postgraduate recruitment rates.

Keywords: Attitude, India, psychiatry, specialists

How to cite this article:
Patra S, Patro BK. What they think of us: A study of teaching medical specialists' attitude towards psychiatry in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2017;59:100-5

How to cite this URL:
Patra S, Patro BK. What they think of us: A study of teaching medical specialists' attitude towards psychiatry in India. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Jul 20];59:100-5. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2017/59/1/100/204434



   Introduction Top


Psychiatry as a discipline continues to struggle with its negative image which results in reduced postgraduate recruitment rates in developed and developing countries.[1],[2] The number of medical graduates opting for psychiatry has shown a steady decline since the last four decades.[3] The US and the UK have unfilled consultant posts in psychiatry, and recruitment to specialty training in psychiatry remains difficult.[4]

In general, medical students have mixed views toward psychiatry: they consider it unscientific, imprecise, and of low status, yet interesting with favorable working hours and working conditions. These conflicting views influence their future career choice.[5] In the United States, medical students feel that going to psychiatry is a waste of medical education.[6] In India, students feel that psychiatry is opted by those who perform low in postgraduate selection exams which restricts the choice of specialties.[7]

Opinions toward patients with psychiatric conditions also influence choosing psychiatry as a career. Many junior doctors find treating patients with psychiatric problems interesting yet challenging. At the same time, the general medical consensus is unfavorable toward patients with psychiatric problems. Patients with psychiatric manifestations are felt unsatisfying to treat and generate far less sympathy than those presenting with physical symptoms.[8],[9] Indian students find treating psychiatric patients uncomfortable.[7]

Medical students' attitude toward psychiatry (ATP) is shaped by the prevailing image of the discipline in the society often created by the mass media; patients with psychiatric illness are often made fun of, psychiatrists and psychiatric treatments projected in a despicable manner in films. Newspapers and books also portray a negative image of psychiatry. These negative portrayals play a crucial role in creating as well as maintaining the negative image of psychiatry in the society.[10] During medical training, students are exposed to teaching medical specialists' own prejudices and “bad-mouthing” (negative comments) with resulting damaging effect on student's attitudes and career choice.[11]

The scientific division of the World Psychiatric Association created the images study group to study the issue of the negative image of psychiatry among the medical community. The group surveyed teaching medical specialists' attitudes toward psychiatry at 15 international academic centers. The dominant findings reported were: teaching medical specialists perceived psychiatry negatively, did not consider psychiatrists good role models, and also felt that psychiatric patients were emotionally draining who need treatment in specialized psychiatric centers. Gender, career stage, and specialization were significantly associated with attitude to psychiatry. Further, there were significant differences in attitudes among the different participating countries.[12]

There is a need to understand the attitude of teaching medical specialists toward psychiatry in different parts of India. We designed the present study to assess ATP of teaching medical specialists of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. We also analyzed the influence of demographic variables, specialization, and duration of professional experience on attitudes toward psychiatry.


   Materials and Methods Top


Study design and sample

We used convenience sampling to carry a cross-sectional survey at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. We invited teaching medical specialists (faculty and senior residents) of this institute and excluded those working in the department of psychiatry. The study period was July–November 2014.

Study instrument

A questionnaire consisting of three parts was used for the study: Part 1 captured the demographic details which included age, gender, and family member with the psychiatric illness. Part II included the field of specialization and duration of the experience. Part III was the modified version of ATP-30 scale. This is a 30-item self-administered, validated, and standardized questionnaire for assessing medical students' attitudes toward psychiatry.[13] We modified the scale by reframing item numbers 4, 10, and 23 to make it appropriate for use in the specialist population [Table 1].
Table 1: Modified items in attitude toward psychiatry-30 scale

Click here to view


As reported by its authors, ATP-30 has good psychometric properties (split half reliability 0.9 and test-retest reliability of 0.87). The scale measures ATP on eight different nonoverlapping domains: psychiatric patients, psychiatric illness, psychiatric treatment, psychiatric knowledge, psychiatrists, psychiatric career choice, psychiatric institution, and psychiatric teaching. Responses to each item are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). The total ATP score is the sum of scores obtained on all 30 items (minimum score is 30 and maximum score is 150).

Statistical analysis

We used IBM SPSS version 16.0 (Chicago, SPSS Inc.) for descriptive statistics. We subtracted all positively phrased item scores: item numbers 4, 5, 9–12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27–29 from six and hence reversed the scores as per the scoring guidelines of the scale. Higher scores mean positive attitudes toward psychiatry. We calculated total ATP-30 and mean ATP-30 scores. Furthermore, keeping the cut off score of 90 as neutral, we categorized total ATP scores into three categories; total ATP >90 as positive ATP, total ATP=90 as neutral ATP and <90 as negative ATP.[13],[14] We used Chi-square test to study the association of three categories of total ATP-30 scores with demographic variables, specialization, and duration of the experience.

We used subgroup analysis to compare mean ATP scores in different demographic, specialization, and duration of experience groups. We used independent t-test for comparison between two groups and ANOVA for analysis involving three or more groups. We kept statistical significance at P< 0.05.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was received from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Participation was voluntary, and all data were de-identified.


   Results Top


Demographic profile

The questionnaire was canvassed to all 104 teaching medical specialists of the institute. Eighty-eight specialists gave consent to participate and provided their completed data sheets, resulting in a response rate of 84.62%. Forty-nine (55.68%) respondents were male and 65 (73.86%) were <40 years of age. Twenty-one reported having a family member with a psychiatric disorder. Clinicians (62%) outnumbered specialists in basic sciences (35%) with surgeons and physicians being similar in number. The detailed demographic profile is given in [Table 2].
Table 2: Demographic profile and mean attitude toward psychiatry scores in different subgroups using independent t-test for two group comparisons and ANOVA for three or more group comparisons

Click here to view


Attitude scores

The mean score of ATP questionnaire was 88.60 (range 72–104) and standard deviation was 6.64, which indicates overall negative attitudes of the participants toward psychiatry. Female gender, having a family member with mental illness and specialization in a clinical discipline, was associated with positive attitudes toward psychiatry (ATP score >90).

We used independent t-test to compare mean ATP-30 scores in two group comparisons of gender (male, female), age (<40 years, ≥40 years), having a family member with mental illness (Yes, No), and super-specialization (Done, Not done). In comparisons involving three or more groups: Specialization (medical, surgical, paraclinical, and preclinical) and duration of professional experience (5, 6–10, ≥11 years), we used ANOVA. Subgroup analysis revealed that female gender (P = 0.0010) and specialists having a family member (P = 0.00074) had a better ATP [Table 2].

We used Chi-square test to evaluate the association of demographic variables, specialization, and professional experience with three categories of total ATP scores (Positive, Negative, and Neutral). No significant association could be ascertained [Table 3].
Table 3: Association of demographic variables and professional experience with total attitude toward psychiatry scores using Chi-square test

Click here to view


Item frequencies

Attitude toward psychiatric illness, treatment, and patients

Most of the specialists (>95%) felt that psychiatric illness deserves at least as much attention as physical illness and that in recent years, psychiatric treatment has become quite effective. Nine out of ten felt that “it is interesting to try to unravel the cause of a psychiatric illness” and “psychiatric patients are as human as other patients” [Table 4].
Table 4: Most favorable items of attitude toward psychiatry questionnaire

Click here to view


Attitude toward psychiatry and psychiatrists

Eight out of ten specialists found psychiatry unappealing and felt psychiatrists talk a lot but do nothing. More than half of the participants (>50%) felt that psychiatrists get less satisfaction from work and that they would not have liked to be a psychiatrist [Table 5].
Table 5: Least favorable items of attitude toward psychiatry questionnaire

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The overall ATP of teaching medical specialists in our institute was negative as evidenced by the mean ATP-30 scores of 88.6. Female specialists and those having a family member with the psychiatric illness had favorable attitudes. Our participants had favorable attitudes toward patients with psychiatric illness but relatively less favorable ATP as a career choice. Till date, information about teaching medical specialists' attitudes toward psychiatry is limited to the images study. The study has reported overwhelming findings of the negative image of psychiatrists, psychiatry as a discipline, and patients with psychiatric illness among teaching medical specialists of fifteen academic centers worldwide.[12] Psychiatrists were not considered good role models. Psychiatry was not considered exciting, intellectually challenging, or evidence-based. Patients with psychiatric illness perceived as emotionally draining to treat. Our findings are similar to the image group data in terms of overall negative attitude.

Image group has ascribed better attitudes toward psychiatry in mid and late career specialists to longer years of exposure to patients with mental illness or colleagues with mental illness who might have shown a response to treatment.[12] The majority of our specialists (73%) were <40 years of age and in their early career phase, which might be the reason of predominant negative image. The image study had found negative attitudes associated with male gender and had explained it in terms of the notion that mental illness is considered a sign of weakness which is contrary to masculinity.[12] Our results of better attitude in female participants can be understood in terms of these explanations. Our study could not find an association of attitude scores with specialization which is different from the results of image group study.

Our participants found psychiatric patients no less human than those with physical illness. They also felt that psychiatric interventions have become more effective. The sympathetic attitude toward patients and favorable attitude toward interventions can help in providing good liaison services in our center.

The attitudes of medical students toward psychiatry reported earlier from Chandigarh and Ahmedabad centers of India are negative.[7],[15] Students do not consider psychiatry as a high ranking medical specialty, feel patients with psychiatric illness should not be treated in general hospitals,[7] and are reluctant to consider it as a career option.[16] Negative views of medical specialists toward psychiatry adversely influence students' attitudes. Adverse comments by medical teaching specialists have been known to change the decision of students who have opted for psychiatry. Negative socialization hypothesis that unfavorable attitudes of nonpsychiatry specialists can dissuade medical students from opting for psychiatry as a career remains relevant in our sample as evidenced by unfavorable attitudes toward the discipline as a career.[16]

While the attitude of medical students toward psychiatry as a discipline and psychiatrists as role models is likely to affect their future career choices, attitude toward patients is likely to affect the quality of clinical care these future doctors provide to patients with psychiatric illness. The proportion of medical students having the opinion “psychiatric illness is the result of previous misdeeds” in Chandigarh had reduced significantly after didactic lectures and clinical exposure highlighting the impact of teaching and clinical exposure on ATP.[7]

Factors influencing attitudes toward psychiatry in our center need to be further explored and modifiable factors (knowledge and exposure in psychiatry) targeted with interventions. Replacement of didactic lectures with problem-oriented teaching, wherein there is more opportunity for patient interaction, can improve student's ATP.[17] Furthermore, elective placements in psychiatry and involving students in brief psychotherapy during medical graduation can provide better opportunities for engaging with and understanding patients with psychiatric illness. Participation in short research projects can provide exposure to the scientific methodology employed in psychiatry.[10] Involvement in these activities can improve the image of psychiatry among undergraduate students who often find psychiatry “unscientific,” “imprecise,” and “waste of medical education.”

Adopting scientific approaches toward diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders can help in overcoming stigma and discrimination experienced by psychiatrists.[18] Utilization of modern neuroimaging methods such as Functional Near Infrared (fNIR) Spectroscopy which assesses altered oxygenation of cortical tissue during cognitive tasks in patients with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and major depression can demonstrate the neurobiological basis hence provide more credence to the medical nature of psychiatric disorders.[19] These neuroimaging methods are simple to use, noninvasive, and potable which make them feasible for use in psychiatry patients. Adoption of these imaging methods in routine clinical practice and sharing these developments in seminars and CMEs organized by professional psychiatric bodies where colleagues from other clinical disciplines are invited can highlight neurological basis of psychiatric disorders.[20] Negative attitudes like “Psychiatry is unappealing as it makes little use of medical training” can thus be countered by these activities.

Psychiatrists' job satisfaction varies in different geographical regions and is determined by workplace environment, job responsibilities, and salary. While in the US, UK, and Europe, psychiatrists suffer from burnout and have low work satisfaction; the scenario is different in Australia and New Zealand where residents report better lifestyle and financial opportunities in psychiatry.[21],[22] Psychiatrists' job satisfaction in India can be studied in the future and shared in different medical forums.


   Conclusions Top


The attitude of teaching medical specialists in our center toward psychiatric illness, treatment, and patients is more favorable while that toward psychiatrists and psychiatry is less favorable. There is a need to understand the correlates of negative attitudes as prevailing negative attitudes may hamper recruitment rates into psychiatry. Improving image of psychiatry can improve recruitment rates into the specialty and quality of clinical care of patients with psychiatric illness.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Barkil-Oteo A. Psychiatry's identity crisis. Lancet 2012;379:2428.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ndetei DM, Khasakhala L, Ongecha-Owuor F, Kuria M, Mutiso V, Syanda J, et al. Attitudes toward psychiatry: A survey of medical students at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Acad Psychiatry 2008;32:154-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brockington I, Mumford D. Recruitment into psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:307-12.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Goldacre MJ, Fazel S, Smith F, Lambert T. Choice and rejection of psychiatry as a career: Surveys of UK medical graduates from 1974 to 2009. Br J Psychiatry 2013;202:228-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cutler JL, Alspector SL, Harding KJ, Wright LL, Graham MJ. Medical students' perceptions of psychiatry as a career choice. Acad Psychiatry 2006;30:144-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Yager J, LaMotte K, Fairbanks L. Medical student attitudes toward psychiatry in relation to psychiatric career choice. J Med Educ 1982;57:949-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gulati P, Das S, Chavan BS. Impact of psychiatry training on attitude of medical students toward mental illness and psychiatry. Indian J Psychiatry 2014;56:271-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Sivakumar K, Wilkinson G, Toone BK, Greer S. Attitudes to psychiatry in doctors at the end of their first post-graduate year: Two-year follow-up of a cohort of medical students. Psychol Med 1986;16:457-60.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Wilkinson DG, Greer S, Toone BK. Medical students' attitudes to psychiatry. Psychol Med 1983;13:185-92.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bhugra D, Sartorius N, Fiorillo A, Evans-Lacko S, Ventriglio A, Hermans MH, et al. EPA guidance on how to improve the image of psychiatry and of the psychiatrist. Eur Psychiatry 2015;30:423-30.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hunt DD, Scott C, Zhong S, Goldstein E. Frequency and effect of negative comments (”badmouthing”) on medical students' career choices. Acad Med 1996;71:665-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Stuart H, Sartorius N, Liinamaa T; Images Study Group. Images of psychiatry and psychiatrists. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015;131:21-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Burra P, Kalin R, Leichner P, Waldron JJ, Handforth JR, Jarrett FJ, et al. The ATP 30-a scale for measuring medical students' attitudes to psychiatry. Med Educ 1982;16:31-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Thompson C, Dogra N, McKinley R. Survey of general practitioner's attitude towards psychiatry. Psychiatrist 2010;34:525-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Parikh NC, Sharma PS, Chaudhary PJ, Gandhi HA, Banwari GH. Study of attitude of interns toward psychiatry: A survey of a tertiary level hospital in Ahmedabad. Ind Psychiatry J 2014;23:143-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Nielsen AC, Eaton JS. Medical students' attitude about psychiatry. Implications for psychiatric recruitment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:1144-54.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Singh SP, Baxter H, Standen P, Duggan C. Changing the attitudes of 'tomorrow's doctors' towards mental illness and psychiatry: A comparison of two teaching methods. Med Educ 1998;32:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gaebel W, Zielasek J. Overcoming stigmatizing attitudes towards psychiatrists and psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015;131:5-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Fukuda M. Optical topography as an auxiliary laboratory test for differential diagnosis of depressive state: Clinical application of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as the first trial for approved laboratory tests in psychiatry. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 2015;117:79-93.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Wasserman D. Some thoughts how to improve the image of the psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015;131:13-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Clark GH Jr., Vaccaro JV. Burnout among CMHC psychiatrists and the struggle to survive. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1987;38:843-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Thomas T. Factors affecting career choice in psychiatry: A survey of RANZCP trainees. Australas Psychiatry 2008;16:179-82.  Back to cited text no. 22
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Suravi Patra
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.204434

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top