Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 240 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Theoretical Back...
    Clinical Applica...
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1262    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 501-505
Marital and family therapy


Department of Clinical Psychology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication5-Feb-2018
 

   Abstract 


Substance abuse is a family disease that adversely impacts both the user and the user's family. The family can act as a risk factor for the development of substance abuse among children and adults. The family can also be involved in therapy to either help the recovery process or prevent substance abuse. Marital and family therapy have been found to be effective in reducing the severity of substance use, lowering marital and family conflict, improving family communication and cohesion as well as effective parenting practices. Behavioural Couples Therapy has been found to have good empirical support for bringing about the desired changes in both substance abuse and marital relationship. While targeting entire families, the most common evidenced based family interventions are Brief Strategic Family Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, Family Behaviour Therapy, Functional Family Therapy and Community Reinforcement Programme. Marital and family therapy have to be sensitive to gender and culture. Effective use of marital and family therapy requires adequate training to equip practitioners in adequately treating not only substance use disorders and family pathology, but also in treating co-morbid mental health conditions.

Keywords: Substance abuse; Marital therapy; Family therapy; Adolescence; Prevention

How to cite this article:
Ahluwalia H, Anand T, Suman L N. Marital and family therapy. Indian J Psychiatry 2018;60, Suppl S2:501-5

How to cite this URL:
Ahluwalia H, Anand T, Suman L N. Marital and family therapy. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 14];60, Suppl S2:501-5. Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2018/60/8/501/224683





   Introduction Top


The focus of family therapy treatment is to intervene in complex relational patterns and to alter them in ways that bring about productive change for the entire family. Family therapy rests on the systems perspective, which proposes that changes in one part of the system can and do produce changes in other parts of the system, and these changes can contribute to solutions. Family therapy in substance abuse treatment has two main purposes. First, it seeks to use the family's strengths and resources to help find or develop ways to live without substances of abuse. Second, it reduces the impact of chemical dependency on both the patient and the family. In family therapy, the focus of treatment is the family, and/or the individual within the context of the family system. The person abusing substances is regarded as a subsystem within the family unit—the person whose symptoms have severe repercussions throughout the family system. The familial relationships within this subsystem are the points of therapeutic interest and intervention[1].

Family is a key resource in the care of patients in India as its culture of inter-dependence gives the family a pre-eminent status. Psychoactive substance abuse and dependence has a significant deleterious impact on the family of the substance user. This impact can then lead to a chain of events which can not only spiral out of control but also spiral downward. In a study carried out in India[2], family burden was found to be moderate to severe in families with a substance dependent person. The burden was characterized by disruption of family interactions, disruption of family routine, disruption of family leisure and financial burden. According to Kumfer[3], since substance abuse is a 'family disease' of lifestyle, including both genetic and family environmental causes, effective family strengthening prevention programmes should be included in all comprehensive substance abuse prevention activities.


   Theoretical Background Top


Studies carried out in the Indian setting have indicated that alcohol dependence in men is linked to marital dissatisfaction[4] and domestic violence[5], psychological distress among their sons[6] and poor parenting practices by the alcohol dependents[7]. Further, alcohol dependence in men has been implicated in family disintegration[8], forcing spouses of alcohol dependents with poor support systems to seek refuge in shelter homes[9] and contributing to adverse childhood experiences in the lives of their children[10]. In addition, family substance abuse is a risk factor for children to develop substance use disorders through interplay of genetic and environmental factors. For instance, parental substance use has been associated with positive expectancies from the substances among their children[11] This familial risk factor has been implicated in pathways to substance abuse among women as well[12].

Apart from the harm caused to the spouses and children due to substance abuse among men, substance abuse among adolescents and young adults has been associated with parental distress and stress[13]. It must be noted that the family can play an important role in preventing substance use among adolescents through maintaining close ties, providing care and nurturance and ensuring adequate monitoring and supervision. The family can also ensure a substance free lifestyle by conforming to social norms and practicing religiosity/spirituality[14]. It has been found that adolescents also perceive a need for parental guidance and family support in their journey of recovery from substance abuse[15].

It is evident that the family can be a risk factor as well as a protective factor. Additionally, the family can facilitate recovery or impede recovery. The astute clinician has to examine various strands of family functioning to determine what aspects have to be strengthened, altered or reduced in order to improve the effectiveness of the approach. These clinical decisions will be informed by the unique features in a given case, making the therapy individually tailored. Thus, empirical literature indicates that clinicians providing interventions for substance dependence should give as much attention to the family as they would give to the patient.


   Clinical Applications Top


Couple Therapy

Couples therapy has been found to be an efficacious treatment for persons with substance use problems. Therapy programmes which have included spouses have been found to be effective in motivating patients to enter and continue treatment. They have also been associated with better outcomes in treatment such as lower substance use, longer periods of abstinence and better marital functioning. The theoretical framework underlying couples therapy is an understanding of substance use and marital discord as being cyclic. Problems in the marital relationship, poor communication and poor problem solving may precede harmful use of substances, and dysfunctional relationships can maintain and facilitate the substance use. Marital and family conflicts also have the propensity to facilitate relapse[16]. In a critique of 41 different treatments for alcohol problems, Behavioural Couples Therapy (BCT) was found to be the only type of family intervention and one of 16 therapies to have adequate empirical support for effectiveness[17]. Hence, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence Guidelines recommends BCT for individuals with harmful drinking and alcohol dependence[18].

In BCT, the patient and spouse are typically seen together in 12-20 weekly outpatient sessions over a 3-6 month period. BCT can be an adjunct to other psychotherapeutic interventions or the mainstay in therapy. Indications for BCT are: availability of both partners for sessions; couples that are married or cohabiting at least for the last one year; one member with substance use problems. Contraindications for BCT are: couple ordered by court to have no contact with each other; gross cognitive impairment or psychosis; severe physical aggression; when both spouses have substance use problems. The intervention is aimed at two goals – substance use recovery and enhanced relationship functioning. Substance use recovery is addressed first with the therapist understanding the patterns of substance use and interactions in the marital dyad[19]. This is indicated in [Figure 1]:
Figure 1: Cycle of treatment components of BCT

Click here to view


Relationship focused interventions are introduced once the patient has maintained abstinence and the couple is regular to sessions. The major goals of this part of the treatment are to enhance positive feelings, communication skills and problem solving. Communication skills include listening skills, expressing emotions directly and negotiation skill

Family Therapy

The focus of substance abuse treatment worldwide is shifting from corrective to a preventive approach. This is due to the fact that the age of developing substance related problems is reducing and impacting the youth. Effective treatment for adolescents is suggested to be one that brings about change in various domains of a young individual's life and context. This necessitates family therapy and combined family and community based interventions for adolescent substance abuse. The therapist and the family should be equal participants in the therapeutic process. Including adolescents' parents into any treatment programme increases the likelihood of treatment adherence and compliance. As a result, family involvement and post treatment support facilitate successful outcomes in treatment of adolescent substance abuse[20].

The term 'Family Based Interventions' is used to describe a collection of intervention models that focus on family communication, cohesion, conflict and parenting practices. The most common evidenced based family interventions are Brief Strategic Family Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, Family Behaviour Therapy, Functional Family Therapy and Community Reinforcement Programme. The goals of these interventions are to bring about systemic changes, skills building, enhancing positive family and social activities, improving communication, problem solving and making non-substance use rewarding[21]. These interventions have shown better outcomes in terms of reduction in substance use, improved family relations, better work outcomes, adherence to treatment, treatment retention and long- term maintenance of gains[22].

Gender and culture are also significant in planning or developing a therapy that aims to modify the immediate social and cultural environment of the adolescent. For instance, abuse, abandonment and depression are key issues that must be addressed for girls with substance use disorders in treatment. Trauma models of substance abuse among girls and women indicate the need to make their family environments safer and healthier. Such gender sensitivity and targeting of delicate issues are very therapeutic and are key factors in reducing self-harm behaviours among girls and young women. Family interventions also effectively reduce intimate partner violence and thereby reduce child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV). The greater stigma attached to substance abuse among girls and women can also be addressed in family therapy in order to reduce feelings of shame and guilt[23]. In addition, the professional treating a patient and family cannot overlook the cultural background that the patient's family comes from. Being culturally sensitive necessarily does not mean that the therapist must belong to the culture, but rather that they have developed sensitivity to the culture by gaining knowledge, observing and paying attention to various behaviours and dynamics and is ready to learn from the patients and their families. The therapist should understand how cultural differences influence substance abuse, health beliefs, help-seeking behaviour and perceptions of behavioural health services[24].
Table 1: Components of Relationship Promises

Click here to view
Table 2: Increasing Positive Exchanges

Click here to view


The family also plays an important role in prevention of substance use and evidence-based interventions for preventing substance use disorders include programs such as 'Family Matters', 'Creating Lasting Family Connections' and 'Brief Strategic Family Therapy'. 'Family Matters' is a universal prevention programme that enables families to identity and address family characteristics, behaviours, and attitudes that can influence adolescent substance use. These include levels of adult supervision and support; family rule-setting and communication; family time spent together; parental monitoring; family/adult substance use; the availability of substances; and social attitudes about substance use in the media and among peers. 'Creating Lasting Family Connections' is a selective programme designed for youth and families in high-risk environments that focus on substance use issues, personal and family responsibilities, and communication and refusal skills. 'Brief Strategic Family Therapy' is an indicated programme designed for families in which children and adolescents exhibit early substance use, rebelliousness, and/or delinquency. This approach strives to increase and reinforce competent family interactions and behaviours through shifting interpersonal boundaries as needed, building conflict resolution skills, and providing parental coaching[25].

Family engagement can range over various modalities, such as telephonic conversations, video sessions, counselling groups, family sessions where the adolescent-family interaction is observed as well as separate sessions with parents, addressing focused upon issues to enhance treatment outcome. Therapy motivations of the parents and family therapy with single parent families are issues that must be clinically assessed and addressed not only before initiating therapeutic contact, but also during the intervention[26]. Further, parents' own substance use difficulties, quality of marital relationship and mental health must be assessed and addressed if required to reduce dysfunction in the family and improve family atmosphere[27]. It is advisable to see the family members separately in individual sessions in order to get pertinent information. Some disclosures may be made only to the therapist and the other family members may be unaware of the disclosed information. It is important for the therapist to maintain privacy and confidentiality regarding such 'family secrets' within the boundaries of ethical guidelines and legal directives. It is also important for the therapist to be objective and not to take sides of any one family member or a dyad.

Therapist's training and experience is mandatory before trying out any intervention. Therapists must be experienced in family therapy skills, and should have had training in individual therapy. Ideally, the therapist must be knowledgeable about family therapy practices as well as substance abuse treatment practices. Family therapists who wish to treat substance abuse must get themselves informed about basic substance related issues as well as substance abuse treatment processes. This may include screening and assessment of substance use, motivational enhancement techniques, relapse prevention, as well as training in specific models of therapy, for e.g. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for substance abuse or Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for co-morbid substance dependence and emotionally unstable personality. Recently[28], it has been recommended that integrated interventions be used for co-occurring substance use disorders and other psychiatric disorders rather than treating only substance abuse or treating only the co-occurring disorder. This approach will necessitate the availability of experienced clinicians and therapists and training will be required to equip practitioners in adequately treating the conditions.

Summary and Future Directions

Substance abuse has a tremendous impact on not only the user but also on the user's family. The family can be a risk factor for substance abuse or it can act as an important resource for recovery from substance abuse. Marital and family therapy for substance abuse have been found to be efficacious for men, women and adolescents. Family interventions have also been successfully used to prevent substance misuse. Considering the sheer number of individuals with substance abuse problems in India, effective treatments such as marital and family therapy should be regularly offered to patients and their family members whenever indicated. This would require tremendous and sustained efforts to train a large number of mental health professionals in these therapy modalities. Apart from ensuring that quality care is provided, it is also important to make the therapies accessible and affordable. In order to maintain contact with the therapist, feasible and affordable technology driven tools such as mobile messaging and apps, and therapy sessions using the internet can be employed. Dedicated programmes that involve the family and community are also required to prevent substance abuse among children and adolescents. These psychosocial interventions are vital for a country like India with its emphasis on family oriented living.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Improving Cultural Competence. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series No. 39. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-4006. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2004. p. 1.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mattoo SK, Nebhinani N, Anilkumar BN, Basu D, Kulhara P. Family burden with substance dependence: a study from India. Indian J Med Res. 2013; 137: 704-711.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kumfer KL, Alvarado R, Whiteside HO. Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention. Subst Use Misuse 2003; 38 (11-13): 1759-1787.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Jeevitha K, Suman LN. Marital relationship, psychological distress and perceived social support among spouses of alcohol dependents. Indian J Clin Psychol. 2010; 37: 127-135.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jeevitha K, Suman LN (2013). Domestic violence victimization: Perspectives from spouses of alcohol dependents. In K. Jaishankar and N. Ronel (Eds). Global criminology: Crime and victimization in the globalized era (Chapter 19; Pp: 353-364). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Michel N, Suman LN. Psychological distress, self-esteem and relationship with parents among adult sons of alcoholics. Journal of Psychosoc Res. 2009; 4: 231-244.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Reshma NS, Sharma MK, Suman LN, Marimuthu P. Parenting practices among alcohol dependent fathers. J Indian Assoc Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2011; 7 (2): 40-56.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Suman LN, Sesha BV. Loss, trauma and suicidal ideation among women living in a shelter. Indian J Clin Psychol. 2013; 40 (1): 34-40.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sowmya HS, Suman LN. Pathways to homelessness, psychological distress and perceived social support among married women in a shelter: Implications for Trauma Informed Care. Indian J Clin Psychol. 2013; 40 (2): 109-115.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kumble C (2017). Betrayal trauma and dissociative experiences among women in a reception center. MPhil dissertation submitted to NIMHANS, Bangalore.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kirmani MN, Suman LN. Parental and peer influences on alcohol related attitudes among college students. IAHRW Int J Social Sciences Rev. 2015; 3 (1): 62-65.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Malik K, Chand PK, Marimuthu P, Suman LN. Addiction severity and comorbidity among women with alcohol use disorders: A hospital based study from India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017; 28: 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp. 2017.03.028  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Shynimol K (2013). Stress and coping among family members of men with substance dependence. MPhil dissertation submitted to NIMHANS, Bangalore.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sukhwal M, Suman LN. Spirituality, religiosity and alcohol related beliefs among college students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2013; 6: 66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp. 2012.08.012  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Anand, T (2016). Perceptions of self, recovery and future among men with early onset substance use disorders. MPhil dissertation submitted to NIMHANS, Bangalore.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fals-Stewart W, Birchler GR. A national survey of the use of couples therapy in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat [Internet]. 2001 Jun [cited 2017 08 15]; 20 (4): 277-83. Available from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bdf6/3b71303dae616bd492cd20eb5951b9faf4c0.pdf  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Moyers T, Hester RK. Outcomes research: alcoholism. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD, editors. Textbook of substance abuse treatment. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1999. p. 45–65.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Alcohol – use disorders: diagnosis, assessment and management of harmful drinking and alcohol dependence. London: NICE; 2011. NICE clinical guideline 115. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG115 (accessed on 16th August 2017).  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Birchler GR, Fals-Stewart W, O'Farell TJ. Couple therapy for alcohol and drug abuse. In: Gurman AS, Lebow JL, Snyder DK, editors. Clinical handbook of couple therapy. Guilford Publications; 2015. p. 523 – 544.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Empowering families, helping adolescents: Family centered treatment of adolescents with alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health problems. Technical Assistance Publication (TAP) Series 6, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 1992. p. 95-97.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hogue A, Liddle HA. Family-based treatment for adolescent substance abuse: controlled trials and new horizons in services research. J Fam Ther. 2009; 31 (2):126-154. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1467-6427.2009.00459.x.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Rowe CL. Family therapy for drug abuse: Review and updates 2003-2010. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2012; 38 (1): 59-81. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1752-0606.2011.00280.x  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Substance abuse treatment: Addressing the specific needs of women. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series No. 51. HHS Pub. No. (SMA) 09-4426. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2009. p. 5-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Improving Cultural Competence. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series No. 59. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4849. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2014. p. 48.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Griffin KW, Botvin GJ. Evidence-based interventions for preventing substance use disorders in adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N A. 2010; 19 (3): 505–526. doi: 10.1016/j.chc. 2010.03.005  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hemovich V, Crano W. Family structure and adolescent drug use: An exploration of single-parent families. Subst Use Misuse. 2009; 44 (14):2099-2113. doi: 10.3109/10826080902858375  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Burstein M, Stanger C, Dumenci L. Relations between parent psychopathology, family functioning, and adolescent problems in substance-abusing families: Disaggregating the effects of parent gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012; 43 (4):631-647. doi: 10.1007/s10578-012-0288-z  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Sterling S, Chi F, Hinman A. Integrating care for people with co-occurring alcohol and other drug, medical, and mental health conditions. Alcohol Res Health. 2011; 33 (4): 338-349. PMCID: PMC3625993.  Back to cited text no. 28
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
L N Suman
Professor and Head, Department of Clinical Psychology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_19_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top