Indian Journal of PsychiatryIndian Journal of Psychiatry
Home | About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Submission | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
    Users online: 1812 Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article Bookmark this page


    Advanced search

    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded232    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 132
Critical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophrenia

Department of Psychiatry, GMC and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

How to cite this article:
Raj R, Singh B. Critical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 2006;48:132

How to cite this URL:
Raj R, Singh B. Critical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2006 [cited 2021 Oct 16];48:132. Available from:


The study by Grover et al. [1] attempts to delineate a case report of factitious psychological symptoms suggestive of schizo≠phrenia with empirical evidence in the literature regarding the existence of these types of cases.[2] There is nothing unique about it; rather, Roger et al. [3] questioned its diagnostic legitimacy in earlier studies. It highlights the diagnostic dilemma faced by professionals in recognizing the disease as a whole rather than in part. The attempt was like unravelling the road less travelled on borderline personality disorder (BPD) by the Indian psychiatric fraternity. The following points need reappraisal: Was it actually a factitious disorder, true or feigned insanity? Then why was Gestalt not attempted before making a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder? The pheno≠menological construct in the case report is fraught with errors.

The age of onset of illness, diagnosis and duration of treatment are not properly delineated. The patient reported a transient attack of blindness that lasted for 12 hours. Besides ophthalmology, the neurologist's opinion in view of the differential diagnosis of occipital seizure, late age onset Gastaut with occipital spikes or basilar migraine was not sought. At the age of 17, the patient developed a seizure and attempted suicide when he was 18. Was it due to an emotionally unstable personality disorder (impulsive type)? Again, in the family history, the authors did not take into consideration the interaction of the patient within the family, level of bonding and attachment, handling of stress, and genetic load for psychiatric vulnerability. Regarding social and interpersonal relationships, these were stated to be normal. How is it possible that a person who was diagnosed according to the IPDE,[4] WHO as having an enduring unstable personality disorder (impulsive type) had normal social and interpersonal relationships? The authors have not elaborated the reason for the decline in academic performance. In the personal history, there was no mention of drug history or substance abuse, peer group relationship and sexual history. The findings of the mental status examination and general physical examination are not mentioned in the report. It was cited that initially the patient had not intended to feign the psychosis but later when his father started giving him due care, he kept on maintaining the illness to save his mother. The authors have tried to put forth a hypothesis of Munchausen syndrome. According to Bursten (as cited by Cheng and Hummel),[5] the major features of the syndrome are dramatic presentation, pseudologia fantastica and wandering. The case does not fulfil the criteria for factitious disorder due to unintentional production of symptoms, motivation to assume a sick role and presence of secondary gain. Hay[6] concluded that simulation schizophrenia is a prodromal phase of psychosis occurring in extremely deviant premorbid personalities. Gunderson et al. [7] concluded that in factitious psychosis, the clinician should suspect the possibility of BPD in which the patient develops psychosis under stressful conditions. Certainly, the intense instability and frequent manipulativeness of borderline patients calls into question the soundness of factitious disorders in the presence of such disorder. It exemplifies the complexity of diagnosing dis-simulation in psychiatric patients and recommends further study.

   References Top

1.Grover S, Kumar S, Mattoo SK, et al. Factitious schizophrenia, Indian J Psychiatry 2005;47:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Pope HG Jr, Jonas JM, Jones B. Factitious psychosis phenomenology, family history and long-term outcome of nine patients. Am J Psychiatry 1982;139:1480-3.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Rogers R, Bagby RM, Rector N. Diagnostic legitimacy of factitious disorder with psychological symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 1989;146:1312-14.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Loranger A, Janca A, Sartorius N. Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 International Personality Disorders Examination (IPDE). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Cheng L, Hummel L. The Munchausen syndrome as a psychiatric condition. Br J Psychiatry 1978;133:20-1.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Hay GG. Feigned psychosis: A review of the simulation of mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 1983;143:8-10.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Gunderson JG, Singer MT. Defining borderline patients: An overview. Am J Psychiatry 1975;132:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  

Correspondence Address:
Rajnish Raj
Department of Psychiatry, GMC and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.31609

Rights and Permissions

This article has been cited by
1 Reply tośCritical appraisal of an article on factitious schizophreniaś
Kumar, S. and Grover, S. and Mattoo, SK and Downloaded, PDF
Indian J Psychiatry. 2006; 48: 203-4